Johnson v. Ryals

CourtDistrict Court, E.D. Arkansas
DecidedMay 27, 2025
Docket4:25-cv-00372
StatusUnknown

This text of Johnson v. Ryals (Johnson v. Ryals) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, E.D. Arkansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Johnson v. Ryals, (E.D. Ark. 2025).

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS CENTRAL DIVISION

MARCUIECE LAMAR JOHNSON #213 PLAINTIFF

No. 4:25-cv-372-DPM

TIM RYALS, Sheriff, Faulkner County; SHAD FOLEY, Detective, Conway Police Department; BETHANY STUBBE, Detective, Conway Police Department; and SCOTT MORAN, Detective, Cuyahoga County Sheriff DEFENDANTS

ORDER 1. Johnson’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis, Doc. 4, is granted. The Court assesses an initial partial filing fee of $6.83. Johnson’s custodian must collect monthly payments from his prison trust account each time the amount in the account exceeds $10. These payments will be equal to twenty percent of the preceding month’s income credited to the account; and they will be collected and forwarded to the Clerk of the Court until the $350 filing fee is paid in full. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(2). The payments forwarded on Johnson’s behalf must be clearly identified by case name and case number.

2. The Court directs the Clerk to send a copy of this Order to the Administrator of the Faulkner County Detention Center, 801 Locust Street, Conway, Arkansas 72034. 3. The Court must screen Johnson’s § 1983 complaint and amended complaint. Doc. 1 & 3; 28 U.S.C. 1915A. He is awaiting trial for a felony rape charge in Faulkner County, Arkansas. State v. Johnson, 23CR-24-1127. Johnson says he was unlawfully arrested and illegally detained. He seeks damages. The Court must abstain from proceeding with Johnson’s federal case. The criminal case is ongoing, Arkansas has an important interest in enforcing its laws, and Johnson may raise his constitutional claims during his state proceedings. Younger v. Harris, 401 U.S. 37, 43-45 (1971); Tony Alamo Christian Ministries v. Selig, 664 F.3d 1245, 1249 (8th Cir. 2012). Further, Johnson hasn't alleged bad faith, harassment, or any other extraordinary circumstances that would make abstention inappropriate. Tony Alamo Christian Ministries, 664 F.3d at 1254. The Court therefore stays his claims until there’s a final disposition of his pending state charges. Yamaha Motor Corp., U.S.A. v. Stroud, 179 F.3d 598, 603-04 (8th Cir. 1999).

The Court directs the Clerk to stay and administratively terminate this case. Johnson can move to reopen this case after final disposition of his state case, including any appeal. Any motion to reopen must be

_2-

filed within sixty days of that final disposition. If Johnson doesn’t file a timely motion to reopen or a status report by 27 May 2026, then the Court will reopen the case and dismiss it without prejudice. So Ordered. UJ pyr otf ip-. D.P. Marshall Jr. United States District Judge 27 Woy 2005

4.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Younger v. Harris
401 U.S. 37 (Supreme Court, 1971)
Tony Alamo Christian Ministries v. Selig
664 F.3d 1245 (Eighth Circuit, 2012)
Yamaha Motor Corp. v. Patricia Stroud
179 F.3d 598 (Eighth Circuit, 1999)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Johnson v. Ryals, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/johnson-v-ryals-ared-2025.