Johnson v. Priest

District Court, W.D. North Carolina·Decided April 29, 2024·No. 3:23-cv-00886·Unknown

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA CHARLOTTE DIVISION 3:23-cv-00886-MR

MONTAVIUS ANTOINE JOHNSON, ) ) Petitioner, ) ) MEMORANDUM OF vs. ) DECISION AND ORDER ) PAZAVAR PRIEST, Acting Warden, ) ) Respondent. ) ________________________________ )

THIS MATTER is before the Court on the Petitioner’s pro se Motion for Certificate of Appealability [Doc. 7]. The Petitioner filed a Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 in this Court on January 2, 2024. [Doc. 1]. The Court entered an Order on February 7, 2024, dismissing the petition as untimely filed, procedurally barred for failure to exhaust his available state remedies, and successive. [Doc. 5]. In that Order, the Court also declined to grant the Petitioner a certificate of appealability pursuant to Rule 11(a) of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases. [Id.]. The Petitioner now moves this Court to issue a certificate of appealability. [Doc. 7]. In doing so, the Petitioner reiterates the arguments set forth in his § 2254 petition. [Id.]. As the Court has previously advised the Petitioner, a certificate of appealability may issue only if the applicant has made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2); see Rule 11(a), Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases. A petitioner must show that reasonable jurists could debate whether the petition should have been resolved in a different manner or that the issues presented were adequate to deserve encouragement to proceed further. See Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 338 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 483-84 (2000). The Court has already set forth its reasoning for the dismissal of the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus and explained why it declined to issue a certificate of appealability. [Doc. 5]. The Petitioner sets forth no new arguments to convince the Court that it should reconsider its prior Order and now issue a certificate of appealability. IT IS, THERFORE, ORDERED that the Petitioner's Motion for Certificate of Appealability [Doc. 7] is DENIED. IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed: April 29, 2024

Martiff Reidinger ey Chief United States District Judge AS

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Johnson v. Priest, (W.D.N.C. 2024).

Johnson v. Priest (Johnson v. Priest) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Slack v. McDaniel
529 U.S. 473 (Supreme Court, 2000)
Miller-El v. Cockrell
537 U.S. 322 (Supreme Court, 2003)