Johnson v. OPTITEK, INC.

Missouri Court of Appeals

Johnson v. OPTITEK, INC.

299 S.W.3d 341, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 1844, 2009 WL 5124540

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided December 29, 2009·No. ED 92923·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Gloria Johnson (“Appellant”) was discharged from her job at Optitek, Inc. (“Employer”) for misconduct and denied her unemployment benefits by a decision by the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission (“Commission”).

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, which sets forth the facts and reasons for this order.

We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Gloria Johnson (“Appellant”) was discharged from her job at Optitek, Inc. (“Employer”) for misconduct and denied her unemployment benefits by a decision by the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission (“Commission”).

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, which sets forth the facts and reasons for this order.

We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Johnson v. OPTITEK, INC., 299 S.W.3d 341, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 1844, 2009 WL 5124540 (Mo. Ct. App. 2009).

Pincite

299 S.W.3d 341 (Johnson v. OPTITEK, INC.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related