In the Interest of T.A.

299 S.W.3d 341, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 1843, 2009 WL 5124581
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided December 29, 2009·No. ED 93291·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

L.A. (“Mother”) appeals from the trial court’s judgment terminating her parental rights to her minor children T.A. and L.A. Mother claims that the evidence was insufficient to support a finding that grounds existed for termination and that termination was in T.A.’s and L.A.’s best interests. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find the trial court’s decision was not clearly erroneous. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties only, setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In the Interest of T.A., 299 S.W.3d 341, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 1843, 2009 WL 5124581 (Mo. Ct. App. 2009).

299 S.W.3d 341 (In the Interest of T.A.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Johnson v. OPTITEK, INC.
299 S.W.3d 341 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2009)