Johnson v. Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company

District of Columbia

Johnson v. Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company

CourtDistrict Court, District of Columbia

DecidedJanuary 7, 2020

DocketCivil Action No. 2019-3470

StatusPublished

This text of Johnson v. Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company (Johnson v. Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Johnson v. Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company, (D.D.C. 2020).

Pincite

Opinion

FILED

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Robert W. Johnson, ) )

Plaintiff, )

)

V. ) Civil Action No. 19-3470 (UNA)

Nationwide Mutual ) Insurance Company et al, ) )

Defendants. )

MEMORANDUM OPINION

This action, brought pro se, is before the Court on review of plaintiffs application to proceed in forma pauperis and complaint. The Court will grant the application and dismiss the complaint.

Complaints filed by pro se litigants are held to less stringent standards than those applied to formal pleadings drafted by lawyers. See Haines v. Kerner, 404 U.S. 519, 520 (1972). Still, pro Se litigants must comply with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Jarrell v. Tisch, 656 F. Supp. 237, 239 (D.D.C. 1987). Rule 8(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure requires that a complaint contain a short and plain statement of the grounds upon which the court’s jurisdiction depends, a short and plain statement of the claim showing that the pleader is entitled to relief, and a demand for judgment for the relief the pleader seeks, Fed. R. Civ. P. 8(a). It “does not require detailed factual allegations, but it demands more than an unadorned, the-defendant- unlawfully-harmed-me accusation.” Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 678 (2009) (internal quotation marks and citation omitted). The purpose of the minimum pleading standard is to give

fair notice to the defendants of the claims being asserted, sufficient to prepare a responsive 1 answer and an adequate defense and to determine whether the doctrine of res judicata applies. Brown vy. Califano, 75 F.R.D. 497, 498 (D.D.C. 1977). The standard also assists the court in determining whether it has jurisdiction over the subject matter.

Plaintiff's list of defendants spans the first ten pages of the thirteen-page handwritten complaint. Most of the defendants are private insurance companies. Plaintiff seeks, among other relief: “$999 trillion dollars” in “punitive damages” and “$999 billion for future pain & suffering.” Compl. at 13. The complaint lacks, among other shortcomings, discernable factual

allegations, Therefore, it will be dismissed. An order will issue separately.

(\Gol-d Hy

Date: Ovc ‘ 3 ( 2 | GY United States District Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

FILED

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Robert W. Johnson, ) )

Plaintiff, )

)

V. ) Civil Action No. 19-3470 (UNA)

Nationwide Mutual ) Insurance Company et al, ) )

Defendants. )

MEMORANDUM OPINION

This action, brought pro se, is before the Court on review of plaintiffs application to proceed in forma pauperis and complaint. The Court will grant the application and dismiss the complaint.

Complaints filed by pro se litigants are held to less stringent standards than those applied to formal pleadings drafted by lawyers. See Haines v. Kerner, 404 U.S. 519, 520 (1972). Still, pro Se litigants must comply with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Jarrell v. Tisch, 656 F. Supp. 237, 239 (D.D.C. 1987). Rule 8(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure requires that a complaint contain a short and plain statement of the grounds upon which the court’s jurisdiction depends, a short and plain statement of the claim showing that the pleader is entitled to relief, and a demand for judgment for the relief the pleader seeks, Fed. R. Civ. P. 8(a). It “does not require detailed factual allegations, but it demands more than an unadorned, the-defendant- unlawfully-harmed-me accusation.” Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 678 (2009) (internal quotation marks and citation omitted). The purpose of the minimum pleading standard is to give

fair notice to the defendants of the claims being asserted, sufficient to prepare a responsive 1 answer and an adequate defense and to determine whether the doctrine of res judicata applies. Brown vy. Califano, 75 F.R.D. 497, 498 (D.D.C. 1977). The standard also assists the court in determining whether it has jurisdiction over the subject matter.

Plaintiff's list of defendants spans the first ten pages of the thirteen-page handwritten complaint. Most of the defendants are private insurance companies. Plaintiff seeks, among other relief: “$999 trillion dollars” in “punitive damages” and “$999 billion for future pain & suffering.” Compl. at 13. The complaint lacks, among other shortcomings, discernable factual

allegations, Therefore, it will be dismissed. An order will issue separately.

(\Gol-d Hy

Date: Ovc ‘ 3 ( 2 | GY United States District Judge

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Johnson v. Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/johnson-v-nationwide-mutual-insurance-company-dcd-2020.

Opinion

V. ) Civil Action No. 19-3470 (UNA)

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack