Johnson v. Morganti

161 A.D.2d 1140
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMay 11, 1990
DocketAppeal No. 1
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 161 A.D.2d 1140 (Johnson v. Morganti) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Johnson v. Morganti, 161 A.D.2d 1140 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1990).

Opinion

Order unanimously affirmed with costs. Memorandum: Supreme Court properly ordered that defendant need not answer certain interrogatories that requested information about defendant’s customer list, parts list, price list, membership in business organizations, blueprints of machinery and related information. Plaintiffs failed to establish that such information was indispensable or could not be acquired in any other way (see, Curtis v Complete Foam Insulation Corp., 116 AD2d 907, 909). Plaintiffs’ contention that defendant’s objections were untimely lacks merit (see, Rinaldo v Syracuse Univ., 51 AD2d 675; cf., CPLR 3133 [a]). The court properly denied plaintiffs’ motion to renew. (Appeal from order of Supreme Court, Seneca County, Falvey, J.—discovery.) Present—Doerr, J. P., Boomer, Green, Lawton and Lowery, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Johnson v. Morganti
161 A.D.2d 1140 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1990)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
161 A.D.2d 1140, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/johnson-v-morganti-nyappdiv-1990.