Johnson v. Louisiana Department of Education

343 F.3d 732, 14 Am. Disabilities Cas. (BNA) 1472, 2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 17252, 2003 WL 21983251
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Johnson v. Louisiana Department of Education. Read the opinion of the Court — 330 F.3d 362
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided August 20, 2003·No. Nos. 02-30318, 02-30369·Published

Opinion

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING EN BANC

Before KING, Chief Judge, and JOLLY, HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS, JONES, SMITH, WIENER, BARKSDALE, EMILIO M. GARZA, DeMOSS, BENAVIDES, STEWART, DENNIS, CLEMENT and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

BY THE COURT:

A member of the Court in active service has requested a poll on the petition for rehearing en banc filed by appellee Theodore Johnson and a majority of the judges in active service have voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc. Further, a majority of judges in active service have determined, on the Court’s own motion, to rehear en banc the consolidated case, Lynn August vs. Suzanne Mitchell, Et Al.

Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that these cases shall be reheard by the court en banc. No decision has yet been made with respect to oral argument. The Clerk [733]*733will specify a briefing schedule for the filing of supplemental briefs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Johnson v. Louisiana Department of Education, 343 F.3d 732, 14 Am. Disabilities Cas. (BNA) 1472, 2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 17252, 2003 WL 21983251 (5th Cir. 2003).

343 F.3d 732 (Johnson v. Louisiana Department of Education) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.