Johnson v. Kohl
This text of 55 Ind. 454 (Johnson v. Kohl) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This case was tried at a special term of the superior court, and appealed to the general term. No errors were assigned in the general term; there is, therefore, no question presented to this court. This practice is well settled Wesley v. Milford, 41 Ind. 413; Farman v. Ratcliff, 42 Ind. 537; Van Dusen v. Kindleburger, 44 Ind. 282; Wilson v. Harrison, 44 Ind. 468; Linsman v. Huggins, 44 Ind. 474; The Indianapolis, etc., Union v. The Cleveland, etc., R. W. Co., 45 Ind. 281; Carpenter v. Sigler, 47 Ind. 202; Buser v. Blair, 47 Ind. 519; Bush v. The Grover and Baker, etc., Co., 48 Ind. 258; Thurston v. Boardman, 48 [455]*455Ind. 426; Russell v. Harrison, 49 Ind. 97; Huffman v. The Indiana National Bank of Indianapolis, 51 Ind. 394; Selking v. Jones, 52 Ind. 409.
The judgment is affirmed, with costs.
Petition for a rehearing overruled at the May term, 1877.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
55 Ind. 454, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/johnson-v-kohl-ind-1876.