Carpenter v. Sigler

47 Ind. 202
Indiana Supreme Court·Decided May 15, 1874·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Osborn, J.

The appellee sued and recovered judgment against the appellant and Nathaniel B. Coder, in special term of the Marion Superior Court. The appellant alone appealed to the general term, where the judgment was affirmed.

[203] The record does not show that any errors were assigned' in general term.

In Wilson v. Harrison, 44 Ind. 468, this court held that we could only know what errors were assigned in general term of the Marion Superior Court as they appeared in the record. “ If none are there, we must presume that none were assigned.. If none were assigned, then the court in general term committed no error in affirming the judgment. It follows that the judgment must be affirmed.”

The judgment of the said Marion Superior Court in general term is in all things affirmed, with costs and five per cent, damages.

Petition for a rehearing overruled.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Carpenter v. Sigler, 47 Ind. 202 (Ind. 1874).

47 Ind. 202 (Carpenter v. Sigler) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Johnson v. Kohl
55 Ind. 454 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1876)