Johnson v. Johnson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Johnson v. Johnson

260 A.D. 1033, 25 N.Y.S.2d 414, 1940 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5953

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 16, 1940

StatusPublished

This text of 260 A.D. 1033 (Johnson v. Johnson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Johnson v. Johnson, 260 A.D. 1033, 25 N.Y.S.2d 414, 1940 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5953 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1940).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action brought to recover a balance of moneys allegedly loaned to the defendant by plaintiff’s intestate and another, plaintiff appeals (1) from an order granting defendant’s motion to preclude plaintiff from offering certain evidence upon the trial, and (2) from an order denying [1034]*1034plaintiff’s motion for a reargument of the motion resulting in the first mentioned order, and for other relief. Order granting defendant’s motion to preclude plaintiff from offering certain evidence upon the trial affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. No opinion. Appeal from order denying reargument dismissed as not appealable. Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, Taylor and Close, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action brought to recover a balance of moneys allegedly loaned to the defendant by plaintiff’s intestate and another, plaintiff appeals (1) from an order granting defendant’s motion to preclude plaintiff from offering certain evidence upon the trial, and (2) from an order denying [1034]*1034plaintiff’s motion for a reargument of the motion resulting in the first mentioned order, and for other relief. Order granting defendant’s motion to preclude plaintiff from offering certain evidence upon the trial affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. No opinion. Appeal from order denying reargument dismissed as not appealable. Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, Taylor and Close, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

260 A.D. 1033, 25 N.Y.S.2d 414, 1940 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5953, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/johnson-v-johnson-nyappdiv-1940.