Johnson v. Johnson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Johnson v. Johnson

256 A.D. 827, 10 N.Y.S.2d 225, 1939 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5040

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 16, 1939

StatusPublished

This text of 256 A.D. 827 (Johnson v. Johnson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Johnson v. Johnson, 256 A.D. 827, 10 N.Y.S.2d 225, 1939 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5040 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1939).

Pincite

Opinion

Action for absolute divorce. Plaintiff appeals from order granting defendant’s motion to set aside an interlocutory judgment of divorce in his favor and granting a new trial on the ground of newly-discovered evidence. The learned Special Term granted the motion upon affidavits and without the stenographer’s minutes of the testimony taken upon the trial. Order reversed upon the law, without costs, and without prejudice to defendant’s right to renew the motion upon proper papers. Lazansky, P. J., Carswell, Johnston, Adel and Taylor, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Action for absolute divorce. Plaintiff appeals from order granting defendant’s motion to set aside an interlocutory judgment of divorce in his favor and granting a new trial on the ground of newly-discovered evidence. The learned Special Term granted the motion upon affidavits and without the stenographer’s minutes of the testimony taken upon the trial. Order reversed upon the law, without costs, and without prejudice to defendant’s right to renew the motion upon proper papers. Lazansky, P. J., Carswell, Johnston, Adel and Taylor, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

256 A.D. 827, 10 N.Y.S.2d 225, 1939 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5040, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/johnson-v-johnson-nyappdiv-1939.