Johnson v. Jeusen

District Court, D. Arizona·Decided February 5, 2021·No. 2:20-cv-01824·Unknown

Opinion

1 WO MH 2 3 4 5 8 9 Timothy Ray Johnson, No. CV 20-01824-PHX-JAT (MHB) 10 Plaintiff, 11 v. ORDER 12 B. Jeusen, et al., 13 Defendants.

14 15 On September 17, 2020, Plaintiff Timothy Ray Johnson, who is confined in the 16 Arizona State Prison Complex-Florence, filed a pro se civil rights Complaint pursuant to 17 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and an Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. In an October 13, 2020 18 Order, the Court dismissed the Complaint for failure to state a claim and gave Plaintiff 30 19 days to file an amended complaint that cured the deficiencies identified in the Order. 20 On November 16, 2020, Plaintiff filed a First Amended Complaint. In a January 21 12, 2021 Order, the Court dismissed Defendants Senseng, Unknown Captain, and King 22 without prejudice and gave Plaintiff 120 days to identify the individual described in the 23 First Amended Complaint as “the person in charge of moving people” and file a notice 24 substituting that individual for Defendant John/Jane Doe 1. The Court also directed the 25 Clerk of Court to issue and send to Plaintiff two blank subpoenas for use in identifying the 26 Doe Defendant. On January 27, 2021, Plaintiff submitted a Letter (Doc. 10) concerning 27 his attempts to identify John/Jane Doe 1 and two incomplete sets of service documents 28 (Doc. 11). 1 I. Letter 2 First, it is improper for a party to communicate directly with court personnel. 3 Simply mailing a letter to the Clerk of Court, the judge, or any court personnel is 4 unacceptable. Any request for action by the Court must be in the form of a motion that 5 complies with the Rules of Practice of the United States District Court for the District of 6 Arizona (the Local Rules). Any future letters directed to the Clerk of Court, the judge, or 7 any court personnel will be stricken from the record and will be returned to Plaintiff. 8 In his Letter, Plaintiff states that when he presented the subpoenas to the officers he 9 intended to serve, former Defendant Captain Pozono1 and non-party Sergeant Reyes, these 10 officers told him they were in charge of inmate movement, contradicting their prior 11 representations. Plaintiff also asserts several new allegations concerning an injury he 12 allegedly suffered on January 12, 2021, a lack of programming and mental health 13 treatment, and additional threats to his safety and states that he would like to add a request 14 for damages. 15 The Court will construe Plaintiff’s Letter as a Motion to Amend the First Amended 16 Complaint. The Court will grant the Motion, as construed, and will give Plaintiff 30 days 17 from the filing date of this Order to file a Second Amended Complaint that includes Captain 18 Pozono and Sergeant Reyes as Defendants and incorporates all of Plaintiff’s new 19 allegations, as well as any new claims for relief that he wishes to assert. 20 II. Leave to Amend 21 For the foregoing reasons, Plaintiff’s First Amended Complaint will be dismissed 22 for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. Within 30 days, Plaintiff may 23 submit a second amended complaint to cure the deficiencies outlined above. The Clerk of 24 Court will mail Plaintiff a court-approved form to use for filing a second amended 25 complaint. If Plaintiff fails to use the court-approved form, the Court may strike the second 26 amended complaint and dismiss this action without further notice to Plaintiff. 27

28 1 This individual was previously identified as Captain “Pizano.” 1 Plaintiff must clearly designate on the face of the document that it is the “Second 2 Amended Complaint.” The second amended complaint must be retyped or rewritten in its 3 entirety on the court-approved form and may not incorporate any part of the original 4 Complaint or First Amended Complaint by reference. Plaintiff may include only one claim 5 per count. 6 A second amended complaint supersedes the original Complaint and First Amended 7 Complaint. Ferdik v. Bonzelet, 963 F.2d 1258, 1262 (9th Cir. 1992); Hal Roach Studios v. 8 Richard Feiner & Co., 896 F.2d 1542, 1546 (9th Cir. 1990). After amendment, the Court 9 will treat the original Complaint and First Amended Complaint as nonexistent. Ferdik, 10 963 F.2d at 1262. Any cause of action that was raised in the original Complaint or First 11 Amended Complaint and that was voluntarily dismissed or was dismissed without 12 prejudice is waived if it is not alleged in a second amended complaint. Lacey v. Maricopa 13 County, 693 F.3d 896, 928 (9th Cir. 2012) (en banc). 14 III. Warnings 15 A. Release 16 If Plaintiff is released while this case remains pending, and the filing fee has not 17 been paid in full, Plaintiff must, within 30 days of his release, either (1) notify the Court 18 that he intends to pay the unpaid balance of his filing fee within 120 days of his release or 19 (2) file a non-prisoner application to proceed in forma pauperis. Failure to comply may 20 result in dismissal of this action. 21 B. Address Changes 22 Plaintiff must file and serve a notice of a change of address in accordance with Rule 23 83.3(d) of the Local Rules of Civil Procedure. Plaintiff must not include a motion for other 24 relief with a notice of change of address. Failure to comply may result in dismissal of this 25 action. 26 C. Possible Dismissal 27 If Plaintiff fails to timely comply with every provision of this Order, including these 28 warnings, the Court may dismiss this action without further notice. See Ferdik v. Bonzelet, 963 F.2d 1258, 1260-61 (9th Cir. 1992) (a district court may dismiss an action for failure comply with any order of the Court). 3 ITIS ORDERED: 4 (1) Plaintiff’s Letter (Doc. 10), construed as a Motion to Amend the First 5 Amended Complaint, is granted. 6 (2) Plaintiff has 30 days from the date this Order is filed to file a second amended 7 complaint in compliance with this Order. 8 (3) — If Plaintiff fails to file a second amended complaint within 30 days, the Clerk of Court must, without further notice, enter a judgment of dismissal of this action without 10 prejudice and deny any pending unrelated motions as moot. 11 (4) The Clerk of Court must mail Plaintiff a court-approved form for filing a 12 civil rights complaint by a prisoner. 13 Dated this 5th day of February, 2021. 14 15 a 3 16 7 _ James A. Teil Org Senior United States District Judge 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 JDDL

Instructions for a Prisoner Filing a Civil Rights Complaint in the United States District Court for the District of Arizona

1. Who May Use This Form. The civil rights complaint form is designed to help incarcerated persons prepare a complaint seeking relief for a violation of their federal civil rights. These complaints typically concern, but are not limited to, conditions of confinement. This form should not be used to challenge your conviction or sentence. If you want to challenge a state conviction or sentence, you should file a petition under 28 U.S.C. ' 2254 for a writ of habeas corpus by a person in state custody. If you want to challenge a federal conviction or sentence, you should file a motion under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 to vacate sentence in the federal court that entered the judgment.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Johnson v. Jeusen, (D. Ariz. 2021).

Johnson v. Jeusen (Johnson v. Jeusen) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related