Johnson v. Ho-Chunk Nation Gaming Commission

1 Am. Tribal Law 249
CourtHo-Chunk Nation Trial Court
DecidedOctober 23, 1998
DocketNo. CV 98-31
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 1 Am. Tribal Law 249 (Johnson v. Ho-Chunk Nation Gaming Commission) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ho-Chunk Nation Trial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Johnson v. Ho-Chunk Nation Gaming Commission, 1 Am. Tribal Law 249 (hochunkct 1998).

Opinion

ORDER (DISMISSAL)

JOAN GREENDEER-LEE, Associate Judge.

On October 21, 1998, the Ho-Chunk Nation Supreme Court reversed this Court decision of August 24,1998. The Supreme Court found that this Court committed an error by ignoring the statute of limitations set out in Ho-Chunk Nation Amended and Restated Gaming Ordinance, Chapter 11, Sec. 1101(c)(i). This ordinance requires that a grievant must file an appeal of the gaming decision within forty-five (45) days of the decision. On April 28, 1998, the plaintiff had filed an appeal of the Ho-Chunk Nation Gaming Commission’s decision which was entered on January 14, 1997. As the time span from the Ho-Chunk Nation Gaming Commission’s decision until the plaintiffs filing of an appeal of that decision exceeds the forty-five (45) day time limit, this Court hereby dismisses the case.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cleveland v. Garvin
8 Am. Tribal Law 21 (Ho-Chunk Nation Trial Court, 2009)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1 Am. Tribal Law 249, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/johnson-v-ho-chunk-nation-gaming-commission-hochunkct-1998.