Johnson v. Erwine

60 Ky. 251, 3 Met. 251, 1860 Ky. LEXIS 63
Court of Appeals of Kentucky·Decided December 14, 1860·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

CHIEF JUSTICE STITES

delivered the opinion oe tee court:

A writ of forcible entry and detainer can only be issued by a justice of the peace. Such was the law under the act of 1810, (1st vol. Digest, 725,) and the Civil Code {section 502,) prescribes the same mode of procedure in such cases.

A county judge, though possessing all the powers of a justice of the peace in criminal and penal cases, and other powers of a like character enumerated in the Revised Statutes, (1st vol. Stanton's edition, 325,) has no right to issue a warrant of forcible entry and detainer; and such process, when issued by him, together with all steps taken thereunder, is void. We therefore think that the motion of the appellee to quash the warrant, together with the other proceedings had under it, and to dismiss the case, should have prevailed.

The judgment of the court below was, however, in his favor; and as the appellant had no right to proceed under a warrant from the county judge, and failed, in any view of the case, to show himself entitled to a judgment of restitution, lie cannot justly complain of the judgment appealed from.

Wherefore said judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Johnson v. Erwine, 60 Ky. 251, 3 Met. 251, 1860 Ky. LEXIS 63 (Ky. Ct. App. 1860).

60 Ky. 251 (Johnson v. Erwine) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Fellows v. Hoyt
44 A. 929 (Supreme Court of New Hampshire, 1897)
Hurlbutt v. Currier
38 A. 502 (Supreme Court of New Hampshire, 1894)
State v. Adams
7 A. 267 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1886)
Horne v. City of Haverhill
113 Mass. 344 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1873)
Cessna v. Stedman
62 Ky. 188 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky, 1864)
Foster v. Plummer
57 Mass. 381 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1849)