Horne v. City of Haverhill
This text of 113 Mass. 344 (Horne v. City of Haverhill) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The certificate of the magistrate, that the deponent was affirmed by him according to law, necessarily implies that he had first performed the duty, imposed upon him by the statutes of the Commonwealth, of determining on inquiry that the witness had conscientious scruples against taking an oath. Gen. Sts. c. 131, §§ 11, 19, 23. Hall v. Hoxie, 3 Met. 251.
Exceptions overruled.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
113 Mass. 344, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/horne-v-city-of-haverhill-mass-1873.