Horne v. City of Haverhill
113 Mass. 344
Opinion
The certificate of the magistrate, that the deponent was affirmed by him according to law, necessarily implies that he had first performed the duty, imposed upon him by the statutes of the Commonwealth, of determining on inquiry that the witness had conscientious scruples against taking an oath. Gen. Sts. c. 131, §§ 11, 19, 23. Hall v. Hoxie, 3 Met. 251.
Exceptions overruled.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Horne v. City of Haverhill, 113 Mass. 344 (Mass. 1873).
113 Mass. 344 (Horne v. City of Haverhill) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Johnson v. Erwine
60 Ky. 251 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky, 1860)