Johnson v. Draney

284 F. 545, 1922 U.S. App. LEXIS 2412
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
DecidedOctober 26, 1922
DocketNos. 6100, 6118
StatusPublished

This text of 284 F. 545 (Johnson v. Draney) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Johnson v. Draney, 284 F. 545, 1922 U.S. App. LEXIS 2412 (8th Cir. 1922).

Opinion

LEWIS, Circuit Judge.

Johnson sued Anderson and three other stockholders in the Lincoln-Kemmerer Coal Company, a Utah corporation, for half of the shares which that company issued in payment for 147.67 acres of coal land (Lots 6, 7, 8 and 9 in Sec. 1, T. 21, R. 116, in Evanston, Wyoming, Land District), on the claim that while the land was a part of the public domain he had let Anderson have $1,400.-00 to use in work to be done in finding and exposing coal thereon, and as consideration therefor it was verbally agreed between them that Johnson should have a half-interest in the land. Anderson got $400.00 in the Spring of 1913, and in August following Johnson let him have $1,000.00 more. Anderson began prospecting for coal on these and other lands in 1912, and in August he filed on Lots 6, 7, 10 and 11 of Sec. 1, at the Evanston land office. At the same time Dr. Elden, of Moline, Ill., who was acting with Anderson, filed on Lots 8, 9, 13, 14 and SE % NW Jd Sec. 1. Elden was to send money to Anderson to prospect for coal and to organize a company to take over the property. He did neither. In April, 1913, Anderson and Elden amended their filings or declaratory statements, Anderson covering Lots 10, 13, 14, 15 and SEjd NW%, and Elden covering Lots 6, 7, 8 and 9. Anderson spent all the money he had on the property and then got $1',000.00 from his brother John, of Moline, Ill. When that had been expended he applied to Johnson and got the $1,400.00. In July, 1913, John Anderson filed on Lots 6, 7, 8 and 9. Julius Anderson directed all of these filings. Tim only'explanation as to why he had his brother file on the lots then covered by the entry of Dr. Elden is that the latter had not kept his agreement and it was feared that he might drop out and the lots would be lost. Thereafter Elden relinquished his filing on Lots 8 and 9 and obtained U. S. Patent for Lots 6 and 7, for which the purchase price was $10,331.90,°and John Anderson obtained U. S. Patent for Lots 8 and 9, for which the purchase price was $8,114.80. They conveyed their titles to the Lincoln-Kemmerer Coal Co., which came about in this way: In the Spring of 1914, and before the purchase price on either entry was paid, 'Julius Anderson went to Ogden, Utah, for the purpose of finding a way to organize a company to take over the property and develop and work it as a mixie, and to raise the $18,446.70, purchase price, soon to be needed to pay for the [547]*547land, else the entries and right to purchase would lapse. He met his co-defendants, Draney, Gosling and Ryan and asked them to assist him. They examined the property, and negotiations resulted in an agreement to organize a corporation with a capital of $250,000.00, to which the property should be and was later conveyed by Elden and John Anderson in compliance with this written contract:

“This agreement made and entered into this second day of May, 1914, at Ogden, Utah, by and between F. Julius Anderson, party of the first part, and W. H. Draney, T. D. Ryan and O. H. Gosling, parties of the second part, witnesseth:
“That, whereas, the party of the first part and the parties of the second part are engaged in promoting the incorporation of a coal company with property at or near Kemmerer, Wyoming,
“And whereas, upon the incorporation of said company and the issuance to the party of the first part of $150,000.00 of the capital stock of said company, the party of the first part does promise to sell and deliver to the parties of the second part and the parties of the second part have promised to purchase of and from the party of the first part for the sum of One Dollar and other good and valuable consideration, $90,000.00 of the capital stock of said company from the $150,000.00 of said capital stock to be so issued to the party of the first part:
“Now, therefore, it is mutually agreed and understood by and between the parties hereto that upon the organization of said company and the issuance to the party of the first part of $150,000.00 of the capital stock of said company, the said party of the first part upon demand hereby agrees to sell and deliver to the parties of the second part, and the said parties of the second part hereby agree to purchase of and from the party of the first part, $90,000.-00 of the capital stock of said company from the $150,000.00 of said capital stock to be issued to the party of the first part for the sum of one dollar and other good and valuable consideration.
“Witness the hands of the parties hereto at the place and day and year first above written. . E\ Julius Anderson,
“Party of the First Part.
“W. H. Draney,
“T. D. Ryan,
“0. H. Gosling,
“Parties of the Second Part.”

The 1,500 shares were apportioned between the defendants accordingly» — 600 to Julius Anderson and 300 to each of the other three defendants. At first the other defendants understood or assumed that Julius Anderson was the entryman, but that was met by his producing a power of attorney from Dr. Elden and a letter from his brother giving him power to deal with their interests. He assured his co-defendants that he would settle with Dr. Elden and his brother by giving them shares out of his 600, which he did. He also let it be known from time to time after the agreement was made that there were others who had assisted him and to whom he would give some of his shares, among them appellant Charles Johnson, to whom he had a certificate issued for 30 shares. The other defendants, in addition to the 300 shares received by each of the 1,500, subscribed and paid for treasury stock (which was the remaining 1,000 shares), and induced their friends and business associates to also take up and pay for treasury stock, and in this way, without any contributions or assistance from other sources, they obtained the necessary corporate funds to pay the purchase price for the land, buy machinery and needed equipment for a mine, and [548]*548start work on the property, and in the course of about 20 months after first meeting Julius Anderson the property had been purchased and made a valuable mine through their investments and efforts. At first several thousand dollars immediately needed were obtained on notes of Draney, Gosling and Ryan. Johnson received the certificate for 30 shares from Anderson in the Spring of 1915 at Rock Springs, Wyo., by mail, and did not begin this suit until October, 1919, although he says that in the Fall of 1917 he attended a trial in the State court at Ogden which involved the question as to whether the 1,500 shares that went to pay for the property had been rightfully issued and distributed, and that he went there to find out about his interest in the company, yet he admits that he said nothing to Julius Anderson, who was also at the trial, about his interest, nor to anyone else regarding the matter. That was a stockholders’ suit (Robertson v. Draney, 53 Utah, 263, 178 Pac. 35), in which cancellation of certificates for 900 shares issued to Draney, Gosling and Ryan, and 600 shares issued to Julius Anderson, was sought, but denied on the ground that the transaction through which they had been issued to those parties was entirely legitimate, that Draney, Gosling and Ryan had rendered value for the shares issued to them and that other stockholders had no just cause of complaint. We think that conclusion was right, and none other could have been reached on the facts, which are there recited in more detail than need be for the issues here.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Roberson v. Draney
178 P. 35 (Utah Supreme Court, 1918)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
284 F. 545, 1922 U.S. App. LEXIS 2412, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/johnson-v-draney-ca8-1922.