Johnson v. Dodge Manufacturing Co.

66 S.E. 548, 7 Ga. App. 231, 1909 Ga. App. LEXIS 607
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedDecember 24, 1909
Docket1990
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 66 S.E. 548 (Johnson v. Dodge Manufacturing Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Johnson v. Dodge Manufacturing Co., 66 S.E. 548, 7 Ga. App. 231, 1909 Ga. App. LEXIS 607 (Ga. Ct. App. 1909).

Opinion

Powell, J.

1. There was evidence to authorize the verdict, and the judge of the superior court did not err in overruling the certiorari.

2. The defense that an action is prematurely brought is dilatory only, and must be specially pleaded. Realty Co. v. Ellis, 4 Ga. App. 402 (61 S. E. 832) ; Jester v. Bainbridge State Bank, 4 Ga. App. 469 (61 S. E. 926). Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

American National Insurance v. Lynch
176 S.E. 546 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1934)
Linam v. Anderson
78 S.E. 424 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1913)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
66 S.E. 548, 7 Ga. App. 231, 1909 Ga. App. LEXIS 607, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/johnson-v-dodge-manufacturing-co-gactapp-1909.