Johnson v. C.R. Bard, Inc.

S.D. Ohio

Johnson v. C.R. Bard, Inc.

DecidedJuly 22, 2022

Docket2:22-cv-02913

StatusUnknown

This text of Johnson v. C.R. Bard, Inc. (Johnson v. C.R. Bard, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, S.D. Ohio primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Johnson v. C.R. Bard, Inc., (S.D. Ohio 2022).

Pincite

Opinion

UNITED STATES JUDICIAL PANEL on MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION

IN RE: DAVOL, INC./C.R. BARD, INC., POLYPROPYLENE HERNIA MESH PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION MDL No. 2846

(SEE ATTACHED SCHEDULE)

CONDITIONAL TRANSFER ORDER (CTO —94)

On August 2, 2018, the Panel transferred 50 civil action(s) to the United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1407. See 316 F.Supp.3d 1380 (J.P.M.L. 2018). Since that time, 334 additional action(s) have been transferred to the Southern District of Ohio. With the consent of that court, all such actions have been assigned to the Honorable Edmund A. Sargus, Jr. It appears that the action(s) on this conditional transfer order involve questions of fact that are common to the actions previously transferred to the Southern District of Ohio and assigned to Judge Sargus. Pursuant to Rule 7.1 of the Rules of Procedure of the United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation, the action(s) on the attached schedule are transferred under 28 U.S.C. § 1407 to the Southern District of Ohio for the reasons stated in the order of August 2, 2018, and, with the consent of that court, assigned to the Honorable Edmund A. Sargus, Jr. This order does not become effective until it is filed in the Office of the Clerk of the United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio. The transmittal of this order to said Clerk shall be stayed 7 days from the entry thereof. If any party files a notice of opposition with the Clerk of the Panel within this 7-day period, the stay will be continued until further order of the Panel.

a true Inasmuch as no objection is FOR THE PANEL: pending at this time, the Ori ect co stay is lifted. af “U Bee | Su120, 2022 PL ERA W: Nagel CLERK'S OFFICE John W. Nichols ie [@) JUDICIAL PANEL ON ei MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION Clerk of the Panel

IN RE: DAVOL, INC./C.R. BARD, INC., POLYPROPYLENE HERNIA MESH PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION MDL No. 2846

SCHEDULE CTO—94 — TAG—-ALONG ACTIONS

DIST DIV. C.A.NO. CASE CAPTION

ARIZONA AZ 2 22—01112 Montalbano v. Honor Health et al CALIFORNIA NORTHERN CAN 3 2202347 Johnson v. C.R. Bard, Inc.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

UNITED STATES JUDICIAL PANEL on MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION

IN RE: DAVOL, INC./C.R. BARD, INC., POLYPROPYLENE HERNIA MESH PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION MDL No. 2846

(SEE ATTACHED SCHEDULE)

CONDITIONAL TRANSFER ORDER (CTO —94)

On August 2, 2018, the Panel transferred 50 civil action(s) to the United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1407. See 316 F.Supp.3d 1380 (J.P.M.L. 2018). Since that time, 334 additional action(s) have been transferred to the Southern District of Ohio. With the consent of that court, all such actions have been assigned to the Honorable Edmund A. Sargus, Jr. It appears that the action(s) on this conditional transfer order involve questions of fact that are common to the actions previously transferred to the Southern District of Ohio and assigned to Judge Sargus. Pursuant to Rule 7.1 of the Rules of Procedure of the United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation, the action(s) on the attached schedule are transferred under 28 U.S.C. § 1407 to the Southern District of Ohio for the reasons stated in the order of August 2, 2018, and, with the consent of that court, assigned to the Honorable Edmund A. Sargus, Jr. This order does not become effective until it is filed in the Office of the Clerk of the United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio. The transmittal of this order to said Clerk shall be stayed 7 days from the entry thereof. If any party files a notice of opposition with the Clerk of the Panel within this 7-day period, the stay will be continued until further order of the Panel.

a true Inasmuch as no objection is FOR THE PANEL: pending at this time, the Ori ect co stay is lifted. af “U Bee | Su120, 2022 PL ERA W: Nagel CLERK'S OFFICE John W. Nichols ie [@) JUDICIAL PANEL ON ei MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION Clerk of the Panel

IN RE: DAVOL, INC./C.R. BARD, INC., POLYPROPYLENE HERNIA MESH PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION MDL No. 2846

SCHEDULE CTO—94 — TAG—-ALONG ACTIONS

DIST DIV. C.A.NO. CASE CAPTION

ARIZONA AZ 2 22—01112 Montalbano v. Honor Health et al CALIFORNIA NORTHERN CAN 3 2202347 Johnson v. C.R. Bard, Inc.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Johnson v. C.R. Bard, Inc., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/johnson-v-cr-bard-inc-ohsd-2022.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack