Johnson v. Brice

107 S.E. 338, 151 Ga. 472, 1921 Ga. LEXIS 300
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided May 10, 1921·No. No. 2206·Published·Cited by 11 cases

Opinion

Gilbert, J.

Tlie court did not err in holding that the contract between Brice and A. E. Hardison was one of landlord and tenant, and that it did not create an estate for years; and in directing a verdict for the defendant.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur. Jordan & Moore, for plaintiff.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Johnson v. Brice, 107 S.E. 338, 151 Ga. 472, 1921 Ga. LEXIS 300 (Ga. 1921).

107 S.E. 338 (Johnson v. Brice) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Henson v. Airways Service, Inc.
136 S.E.2d 747 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1964)
Alwood v. Commercial Union Assurance Co.
131 S.E.2d 594 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1963)
Ginsberg v. Wade
97 S.E.2d 915 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1957)
Midtown Chain Hotels Co. v. Bender
49 S.E.2d 779 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1948)
State v. Davison
31 S.E.2d 225 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1944)
Griffith v. Smith
118 S.E. 194 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1923)