Johnson v. Brice

107 S.E. 338, 151 Ga. 472, 1921 Ga. LEXIS 300
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedMay 10, 1921
DocketNo. 2206
StatusPublished
Cited by11 cases

This text of 107 S.E. 338 (Johnson v. Brice) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Johnson v. Brice, 107 S.E. 338, 151 Ga. 472, 1921 Ga. LEXIS 300 (Ga. 1921).

Opinion

Gilbert, J.

Tlie court did not err in holding that the contract between Brice and A. E. Hardison was one of landlord and tenant, and that it did not create an estate for years; and in directing a verdict for the defendant.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur. Jordan & Moore, for plaintiff.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Henson v. Airways Service, Inc.
136 S.E.2d 747 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1964)
Alwood v. Commercial Union Assurance Co.
131 S.E.2d 594 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1963)
Ginsberg v. Wade
97 S.E.2d 915 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1957)
Midtown Chain Hotels Co. v. Bender
49 S.E.2d 779 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1948)
State v. Davison
31 S.E.2d 225 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1944)
Griffith v. Smith
118 S.E. 194 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1923)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
107 S.E. 338, 151 Ga. 472, 1921 Ga. LEXIS 300, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/johnson-v-brice-ga-1921.