Griffith v. Smith

Supreme Court of Georgia

Griffith v. Smith

118 S.E. 195, 155 Ga. 720, 1923 Ga. LEXIS 154

CourtSupreme Court of Georgia

DecidedJune 7, 1923

DocketNo. 3415

StatusPublished

This text of 118 S.E. 195 (Griffith v. Smith) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Griffith v. Smith, 118 S.E. 195, 155 Ga. 720, 1923 Ga. LEXIS 154 (Ga. 1923).

Pincite

Opinion

Hill, J.'

In this ease a distress warrant was sworn out by the defendants against the plaintiffs, based on the rent contract involved in the case of Griffith v. Smith, this day decided. The trial judge directed a verdict on the pleadings, after proof was submitted as to the amount of rent due. The rulings m the above-stated case are controlling here; and it follows that the court did not err in directing a verdict for the plain.tiffs. Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hill, J.'

In this ease a distress warrant was sworn out by the defendants against the plaintiffs, based on the rent contract involved in the case of Griffith v. Smith, this day decided. The trial judge directed a verdict on the pleadings, after proof was submitted as to the amount of rent due. The rulings m the above-stated case are controlling here; and it follows that the court did not err in directing a verdict for the plain.tiffs. Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

118 S.E. 195, 155 Ga. 720, 1923 Ga. LEXIS 154, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/griffith-v-smith-ga-1923.