Johnson v. Bailey

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-8037

ZANE A. JOHNSON,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

STEVE BAILEY; ROBERT C. LEWIS; KEITH WHITENER; CARLOS HERNANDEZ; ROSAMUEL DAWKINS; DOUG WALKER; FNU EVANS; FNU KIRBY; FNU CHRISTOPHER,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Statesville. Graham C. Mullen, Senior District Judge. (5:09-cv-00109-GCM)

Submitted: February 18, 2010 Decided: February 26, 2010

Before WILKINSON, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Zane A. Johnson, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Zane A. Johnson appeals the district court’s order

denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We

have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we deny Johnson’s motion for appointment of counsel

and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.

Johnson v. Bailey, No. 5:09-cv-00109-GCM (W.D.N.C. Oct. 23,

2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

AFFIRMED