Johnson v. Bailey

Fourth Circuit

Johnson v. Bailey

367 F. App'x 451

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided February 26, 2010·No. No. 09-8037·Published

Opinion

[452]*452Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Zane A. Johnson appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Johnson’s motion for appointment of counsel and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Johnson v. Bailey, No. 5:09-cv-00109-GCM, 2009 WL 3423016 (W.D.N.C. Oct. 23, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[452]*452Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Zane A. Johnson appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Johnson’s motion for appointment of counsel and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Johnson v. Bailey, No. 5:09-cv-00109-GCM, 2009 WL 3423016 (W.D.N.C. Oct. 23, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Johnson v. Bailey, 367 F. App'x 451 (4th Cir. 2010).

Pincite

367 F. App'x 451 (Johnson v. Bailey) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related