JOHNSON v. ADESA
Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA INDIANAPOLIS DIVISION
ROBERT W. JOHNSON, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) No. 1:19-cv-04754-JPH-MJD ) ADESA et al, ) ) Defendant. )
ORDER DENYING REQUEST TO PROCEED ON APPEAL IN FORMA PAUPERIS
Robert Johnson seeks leave to proceed on appeal without prepaying the appellate fees of $505.00. Dkt. 9. However, an appeal may not be taken in forma pauperis if the trial court certifies that the appeal is not taken in “good faith.” 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3). “Good faith,” in the context of § 1915(a)(3), refers to the “more common legal meaning of the term, in which to sue in bad faith means merely to sue on the basis of a frivolous claim.” Lee v. Clinton, 209 F.3d 1025, 1026 (7th Cir. 2000). In other words, § 1915(a)(3)’s “good faith” determination is not about the plaintiff’s sincerity in requesting appellate review. See Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444–45 (1962). A sincere litigant still lacks objective “good faith” under § 1915(a)(3) if his claim is one that “no reasonable person could suppose to have any merit.” Lee, 209 F.3d at 1026. Under this standard, Mr. Johnson’s request to appeal in forma pauperis must be denied. He seeks to appeal the Court’s order dismissing his complaint for lack of jurisdiction. See dkt. 5. But the Court did not issue final judgment under Rule 54(b), see House v. Belford, 956 F.2d 711, 716 (7th Cir. 1992), and the order does not qualify as an appealable interlocutory order under 28 U.S.C. § 1292. The order is therefore not appealable at this time, and the Seventh Circuit has dismissed similar appeals for lack of jurisdiction. See, e.g., Bryant v. United States, No. 17-2813, 2017 WL 8159216, at *1 (7th Cir. Oct. 24, 20177). Because there is no objectively reasonable argument that Mr. Johnson’s proposed appeal has merit at this point in his case, this appeal is not taken in “good faith,” and the motion for leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis, dkt. [9], is DENIED. SO ORDERED. Date: 1/14/2020 Sjamu Patrick hawlove James Patrick Hanlon United States District Judge Southern District of Indiana Distribution: ROBERT W. JOHNSON 3345 FISH AVE. APT. 1 BRONX, NY 10469
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
JOHNSON v. ADESA (JOHNSON v. ADESA) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.