Johnson Co. v. Thomson-Houston Electric Co.

84 F. 16, 27 C.C.A. 681, 1897 U.S. App. LEXIS 2171
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit·Decided September 21, 1897·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

And now, this 21st day of September, A. D. 1897, in view of the stipulation between counsel attached hereto consenting to the same, it is ordered that the decretal order of the circuit court of the United States for the Western district of Pennsylvania, made January 28, 1897, enjoining the Johnson Company, of Pennsylvania, the Steel Motor Company, and R. T. Lane from infringing the 6th, 7th, 8th, 12th, and 16th claims of patent No. 495,443, issued to C. A. Coffin and Albert Wahl, administrators of Charles J. Van Depoele, deceased, assignors to the Thomson-Houston Electric Company, be reversed, with costs, without prejudice to the rights of either party at final hearing upon the said claims or other claims of said letters patent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Johnson Co. v. Thomson-Houston Electric Co., 84 F. 16, 27 C.C.A. 681, 1897 U.S. App. LEXIS 2171 (3d Cir. 1897).

84 F. 16 (Johnson Co. v. Thomson-Houston Electric Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Thomson-Houston Electric Co. v. Sterling-Meaker Co.
150 F. 589 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of New Jersey, 1907)