Johnson Co. v. Thomson-Houston Electric Co.
This text of 84 F. 16 (Johnson Co. v. Thomson-Houston Electric Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
And now, this 21st day of September, A. D. 1897, in view of the stipulation between counsel attached hereto consenting to the same, it is ordered that the decretal order of the circuit court of the United States for the Western district of Pennsylvania, made January 28, 1897, enjoining the Johnson Company, of Pennsylvania, the Steel Motor Company, and R. T. Lane from infringing the 6th, 7th, 8th, 12th, and 16th claims of patent No. 495,443, issued to C. A. Coffin and Albert Wahl, administrators of Charles J. Van Depoele, deceased, assignors to the Thomson-Houston Electric Company, be reversed, with costs, without prejudice to the rights of either party at final hearing upon the said claims or other claims of said letters patent.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
84 F. 16, 27 C.C.A. 681, 1897 U.S. App. LEXIS 2171, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/johnson-co-v-thomson-houston-electric-co-ca3-1897.