Johns v. State

270 S.W. 1117, 100 Tex. Crim. 6, 1925 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 304
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Johns v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 100 Tex. Crim. 65
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided April 15, 1925·No. No. 8865.·Published

Opinion

LATTIMORE, Judge.

dge. Appellant was convicted in the district court of Floyd county of transporting intoxicating liquor, and his punishment fixed at one year in the penitentiary.

The statement of facts shows practically without dispute, save by appellant himself, the transportation of intoxicating liquor by appellant that justifies the judgment of conviction. There is but one bill of exceptions which, under the qualification appended- thereto by the trial judge without objection, shows no error. The judgment will be affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Johns v. State, 270 S.W. 1117, 100 Tex. Crim. 6, 1925 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 304 (Tex. 1925).

270 S.W. 1117 (Johns v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.