Johns v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Johns v. State

270 S.W. 1117, 100 Tex. Crim. 6, 1925 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 304

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas

DecidedApril 15, 1925

DocketNo. 8865.

StatusPublished

This text of 270 S.W. 1117 (Johns v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Johns v. State, 270 S.W. 1117, 100 Tex. Crim. 6, 1925 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 304 (Tex. 1925).

Pincite

Opinion

LATTIMORE, Judge.

dge. Appellant was convicted in the district court of Floyd county of transporting intoxicating liquor, and his punishment fixed at one year in the penitentiary.

The statement of facts shows practically without dispute, save by appellant himself, the transportation of intoxicating liquor by appellant that justifies the judgment of conviction. There is but one bill of exceptions which, under the qualification appended- thereto by the trial judge without objection, shows no error. The judgment will be affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

LATTIMORE, Judge.

dge. Appellant was convicted in the district court of Floyd county of transporting intoxicating liquor, and his punishment fixed at one year in the penitentiary.

The statement of facts shows practically without dispute, save by appellant himself, the transportation of intoxicating liquor by appellant that justifies the judgment of conviction. There is but one bill of exceptions which, under the qualification appended- thereto by the trial judge without objection, shows no error. The judgment will be affirmed.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

270 S.W. 1117, 100 Tex. Crim. 6, 1925 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 304, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/johns-v-state-texcrimapp-1925.