Johnathan Cole v. James Purkett, Superintendent at Farmington Correctional Center

155 F.3d 558, 1998 WL 396122
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
DecidedJuly 8, 1998
Docket97-4336
StatusPublished
Cited by26 cases

This text of 155 F.3d 558 (Johnathan Cole v. James Purkett, Superintendent at Farmington Correctional Center) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Johnathan Cole v. James Purkett, Superintendent at Farmington Correctional Center, 155 F.3d 558, 1998 WL 396122 (8th Cir. 1998).

Opinion

155 F.3d 558

Johnathan COLE, Appellant,
v.
James Purkett, Superintendent at Farmington Correctional
Center, Appellee.

No. 97-4336.

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

Submitted May 15, 1998.
Decided July 8, 1998.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri.

Before BEAM, LOKEN, and MURPHY, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Johnathan Cole appeals the district court's1 denial of his pro se petition for a writ of habeas corpus. He claims that the prosecution's evidence in his state trial was so constitutionally insufficient as to deny him due process of law under the Fourteenth Amendment. Specifically, Cole argues that the testimony of four police officers who claim to have seen him in possession of cocaine is inconsistent with a videotape of the drug transaction and Cole's subsequent arrest. The inconsistency, argues Cole, resulted in a verdict unsupported by substantial evidence. The district court held that the officers' credibility and inconsistencies in the testimony were questions for the jury and did not go to the submissibility of the state's case. After carefully reviewing the entire record, including the videotape,2 the trial transcripts, and the parties' briefs, we conclude that the judgment of the district court was correct. Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

1

The Honorable Carol E. Jackson, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Missouri, adopting the Report and Recommendation of the Honorable Terry I. Adelman, United States Magistrate Judge for the Eastern District of Missouri

2

We grant Cole's motion to supplement the record with a copy of the videotape admitted into evidence at his trial

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hagelin v. Caudill
W.D. Virginia, 2021
Eilber v. Floor Care Specialists, Inc.
807 S.E.2d 219 (Supreme Court of Virginia, 2017)
Reyazuddin v. Montgomery County
7 F. Supp. 3d 526 (D. Maryland, 2014)
Farah v. Comm'r
2007 T.C. Memo. 369 (U.S. Tax Court, 2007)
Thrane v. Comm'r
2006 T.C. Memo. 269 (U.S. Tax Court, 2006)
Dachman v. United States
73 Fed. Cl. 508 (Federal Claims, 2006)
KIVETT v. COMMISSIONER
2006 T.C. Summary Opinion 114 (U.S. Tax Court, 2006)
MANSEL v. COMMISSIONER
2005 T.C. Summary Opinion 157 (U.S. Tax Court, 2005)
Mohan v. Norris
871 A.2d 575 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 2005)
REIMANN v. COMMISSIONER
2005 T.C. Summary Opinion 10 (U.S. Tax Court, 2005)
People ex rel. S.G.
91 P.3d 443 (Colorado Court of Appeals, 2004)
Payne v. Comm'r
2003 T.C. Memo. 90 (U.S. Tax Court, 2003)
Rogosin v. Mayor & City Council of Baltimore
197 F. Supp. 2d 345 (D. Maryland, 2002)
Estate of Fennell Ex Rel. Fennell v. Stephenson
554 S.E.2d 629 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 2001)
Estate of Fennell Ex Rel. Fennell v. Stephenson
528 S.E.2d 911 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2000)
Bolinsky v. Carter MacHinery Co., Inc.
69 F. Supp. 2d 842 (W.D. Virginia, 1999)
Tobin v. Commissioner
1999 T.C. Memo. 328 (U.S. Tax Court, 1999)
Klyce v. Commissioner
1999 T.C. Memo. 198 (U.S. Tax Court, 1999)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
155 F.3d 558, 1998 WL 396122, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/johnathan-cole-v-james-purkett-superintendent-at-farmington-correctional-ca8-1998.