John Wayne Shutt Robert James Bearden David Houser Ronald Cross v. Stephen Norris George Little Glenn W. Rogers Joe Fowler

865 F.2d 261, 1988 U.S. App. LEXIS 16472, 1988 WL 128775
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
DecidedDecember 5, 1988
Docket88-6091
StatusUnpublished

This text of 865 F.2d 261 (John Wayne Shutt Robert James Bearden David Houser Ronald Cross v. Stephen Norris George Little Glenn W. Rogers Joe Fowler) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
John Wayne Shutt Robert James Bearden David Houser Ronald Cross v. Stephen Norris George Little Glenn W. Rogers Joe Fowler, 865 F.2d 261, 1988 U.S. App. LEXIS 16472, 1988 WL 128775 (6th Cir. 1988).

Opinion

865 F.2d 261

Unpublished Disposition
NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Sixth Circuit.
John Wayne SHUTT; Robert James Bearden; David Houser;
Plaintiffs-Appellants,
Ronald Cross, Plaintiff,
v.
Stephen NORRIS; George Little; Glenn W. Rogers; Joe
Fowler, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 88-6091.

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

Dec. 5, 1988.

Before KENNEDY, RALPH B. GUY, Jr. and RYAN, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

This appeal has been referred to a panel of the court pursuant to Rule 9(a), Rules of the Sixth Circuit.

A review of the record indicates that the defendant, Joe Fowler, filed on August 26, 1988, in the district court a motion to dismiss the 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 prisoner civil rights complaint. The plaintiffs filed a notice of appeal on August 30, 1988, from the motion to dismiss.

This court lacks jurisdiction to review a motion filed in the district court. No final decision has been entered in the case nor has an order been certified for interlocutory appeal under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1292(b) or Fed.R.Civ.P. 54(b). Donovan v. Hayden, Stone, Inc., 434 F.2d 619, 620 (6th Cir.1970) (per curiam); William B. Tanner Co. v. United States, 575 F.2d 101 (6th Cir.1978) (per curiam); Oak Construction Co. v. Huron Cement Co., 475 F.2d 1220 (6th Cir.1973) (per curiam).

It is ORDERED that the appeal be and hereby is dismissed. Rule 9(b)(1), Rules of the Sixth Circuit.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Dennis D. Donovan v. Hayden, Stone, Inc.
434 F.2d 619 (Sixth Circuit, 1970)
Oak Construction Company v. Huron Cement Company
475 F.2d 1220 (Sixth Circuit, 1973)
William B. Tanner Company, Inc. v. United States
575 F.2d 101 (Sixth Circuit, 1978)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
865 F.2d 261, 1988 U.S. App. LEXIS 16472, 1988 WL 128775, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/john-wayne-shutt-robert-james-bearden-david-houser-ca6-1988.