John T. Zervas v. Edward C. Aldridge, Secretary of the Air Force

923 F.2d 202, 287 U.S. App. D.C. 379, 1990 U.S. App. LEXIS 23311, 1990 WL 256329
CourtCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
DecidedOctober 15, 1990
Docket90-1162
StatusUnpublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 923 F.2d 202 (John T. Zervas v. Edward C. Aldridge, Secretary of the Air Force) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
John T. Zervas v. Edward C. Aldridge, Secretary of the Air Force, 923 F.2d 202, 287 U.S. App. D.C. 379, 1990 U.S. App. LEXIS 23311, 1990 WL 256329 (D.C. Cir. 1990).

Opinion

923 F.2d 202

287 U.S.App.D.C. 379

Unpublished Disposition
NOTICE: D.C. Circuit Local Rule 11(c) states that unpublished orders, judgments, and explanatory memoranda may not be cited as precedents, but counsel may refer to unpublished dispositions when the binding or preclusive effect of the disposition, rather than its quality as precedent, is relevant.
John T. ZERVAS, Appellant,
v.
Edward C. ALDRIDGE, Secretary of the Air Force, Appellee.

No. 90-1162.

United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.

Oct. 15, 1990.

Before WALD, Chief Judge, and HARRY T. EDWARDS and HENDERSON, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Upon consideration of appellee's motion for summary affirmance and the reply thereto, it is

ORDERED that the motion for summary affirmance be granted substantially for the reasons stated by the district court in its memorandum opinion and order filed September 14, 1989. The merits of the parties' positions are so clear as to justify summary action. See Taxpayers Watchdog, Inc. v. Stanley, 819 F.2d 294, 297 (D.C.Cir.1987) (per curiam); Walker v. Washington, 627 F.2d 541, 545 (D.C.Cir.) (per curiam), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 994 (1980).

The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after disposition of any timely petition for rehearing. See D.C.Cir.Rule 15.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
923 F.2d 202, 287 U.S. App. D.C. 379, 1990 U.S. App. LEXIS 23311, 1990 WL 256329, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/john-t-zervas-v-edward-c-aldridge-secretary-of-the-cadc-1990.