John S. Ford, Willie Cain v. United States Steel Corporation, Etc.

Fifth Circuit

John S. Ford, Willie Cain v. United States Steel Corporation, Etc.

648 F.2d 978, 1981 U.S. App. LEXIS 12095

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

DecidedJune 22, 1981

Docket78-1246

StatusPublished

This text of 648 F.2d 978 (John S. Ford, Willie Cain v. United States Steel Corporation, Etc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

John S. Ford, Willie Cain v. United States Steel Corporation, Etc., 648 F.2d 978, 1981 U.S. App. LEXIS 12095 (5th Cir. 1981).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Defendant-Appellee the United Steelworkers of America, AFL-CIO-CLC, has petitioned for a rehearing before the panel in this case. It asserts that a sentence in the opening paragraph of the opinion, 638 F.2d 753, is potentially troublesome, as it might be read as constituting an adjudication of the rights and liabilities of the parties in further proceedings in this lawsuit. To avert any misunderstanding, we wish to emphasize that the expression used was merely descriptive of the posture of the case then; we in no way meant to decide those issues which will arise if a new class is ultimately certified.

Accordingly, and with this caveat, the petition for rehearing is DENIED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Defendant-Appellee the United Steelworkers of America, AFL-CIO-CLC, has petitioned for a rehearing before the panel in this case. It asserts that a sentence in the opening paragraph of the opinion, 638 F.2d 753, is potentially troublesome, as it might be read as constituting an adjudication of the rights and liabilities of the parties in further proceedings in this lawsuit. To avert any misunderstanding, we wish to emphasize that the expression used was merely descriptive of the posture of the case then; we in no way meant to decide those issues which will arise if a new class is ultimately certified.

Accordingly, and with this caveat, the petition for rehearing is DENIED.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

648 F.2d 978, 1981 U.S. App. LEXIS 12095, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/john-s-ford-willie-cain-v-united-states-steel-corporation-etc-ca5-1981.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack