John R. Balelo v. Malcolm Baldrige, Secretary of Commerce of the United States, John R. Balelo v. Malcolm Baldrige, Secretary of Commerce of the United States, and Environmental Defense Fund, Inc. And Defenders of Wildlife, Inc., Intervenors-Defendants-Appellants. United States of America v. $50,178.80, the Monetary Value of 57 Tons of Tuna, and Gladiator Fishing, Inc., Claimant-Appellant

706 F.2d 937
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedMay 19, 1983
Docket82-5433
StatusPublished

This text of 706 F.2d 937 (John R. Balelo v. Malcolm Baldrige, Secretary of Commerce of the United States, John R. Balelo v. Malcolm Baldrige, Secretary of Commerce of the United States, and Environmental Defense Fund, Inc. And Defenders of Wildlife, Inc., Intervenors-Defendants-Appellants. United States of America v. $50,178.80, the Monetary Value of 57 Tons of Tuna, and Gladiator Fishing, Inc., Claimant-Appellant) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
John R. Balelo v. Malcolm Baldrige, Secretary of Commerce of the United States, John R. Balelo v. Malcolm Baldrige, Secretary of Commerce of the United States, and Environmental Defense Fund, Inc. And Defenders of Wildlife, Inc., Intervenors-Defendants-Appellants. United States of America v. $50,178.80, the Monetary Value of 57 Tons of Tuna, and Gladiator Fishing, Inc., Claimant-Appellant, 706 F.2d 937 (9th Cir. 1983).

Opinion

706 F.2d 937

John R. BALELO, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellees,
v.
Malcolm BALDRIGE, Secretary of Commerce of the United
States, et al., Defendants-Appellants.
John R. BALELO, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellees,
v.
Malcolm BALDRIGE, Secretary of Commerce of the United
States, et al., Defendants,
and
Environmental Defense Fund, Inc. and Defenders of Wildlife,
Inc., Intervenors-Defendants-Appellants.
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
$50,178.80, THE MONETARY VALUE OF 57 TONS OF TUNA, Defendant,
and
Gladiator Fishing, Inc., Claimant-Appellant.

Nos. 81-5806, 81-5807 and 82-5433.

United States Court of Appeals,
Ninth Circuit.

May 19, 1983.

Raymond F. Zvetina, Haskins, Nugent, Newnham, Kane & Zvetina, San Diego, Cal., for Balelo.

Donald A. Carr, Washington, D.C., for Klutznick.

Wayne S. Braveman, Tuttle & Taylor, Los Angeles, Cal., for Environmental Defense Fund.

Before BROWNING, Chief Judge, and WRIGHT, CHOY, GOODWIN, WALLACE, SNEED, KENNEDY, ANDERSON, HUG, TANG, SKOPIL, SCHROEDER, FLETCHER, FARRIS, PREGERSON, ALARCON, POOLE, FERGUSON, NELSON, CANBY, BOOCHEVER, NORRIS, and REINHARDT, Circuit Judges.

Upon the vote of a majority of the regular active judges of this court, it is ordered that these cases shall be reheard by an en banc panel of the court pursuant to Rule 25 of the Rules of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. The previous three-judge panel assignments are hereby withdrawn.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Balelo v. Baldrige
706 F.2d 937 (Ninth Circuit, 1983)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
706 F.2d 937, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/john-r-balelo-v-malcolm-baldrige-secretary-of-commerce-of-the-united-ca9-1983.