Home/Ninth Circuit/Balelo v. Baldrige

Balelo v. Baldrige

706 F.2d 937
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided May 19, 1983·No. Nos. 81-5806, 81-5807 and 82-5433·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Upon the vote of a majority of the regular active judges of this court, it is ordered that these cases shall be reheard by an en banc panel of the court pursuant to Rule 25 of the Rules of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. The previous three-judge panel assignments are hereby withdrawn.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Balelo v. Baldrige, 706 F.2d 937 (9th Cir. 1983).

706 F.2d 937 (Balelo v. Baldrige) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

John R. Balelo v. Malcolm Baldrige, Secretary of Commerce of the United States, John R. Balelo v. Malcolm Baldrige, Secretary of Commerce of the United States, and Environmental Defense Fund, Inc. And Defenders of Wildlife, Inc., Intervenors-Defendants-Appellants. United States of America v. $50,178.80, the Monetary Value of 57 Tons of Tuna, and Gladiator Fishing, Inc., Claimant-Appellant
706 F.2d 937 (Ninth Circuit, 1983)