Home/Ninth Circuit/Balelo v. Baldrige

Balelo v. Baldrige

706 F.2d 937
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedMay 19, 1983
DocketNos. 81-5806, 81-5807 and 82-5433
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 706 F.2d 937 (Balelo v. Baldrige) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Balelo v. Baldrige, 706 F.2d 937 (9th Cir. 1983).

Opinion

Upon the vote of a majority of the regular active judges of this court, it is ordered that these cases shall be reheard by an en banc panel of the court pursuant to Rule 25 of the Rules of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. The previous three-judge panel assignments are hereby withdrawn.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

John R. Balelo v. Malcolm Baldrige, Secretary of Commerce of the United States, John R. Balelo v. Malcolm Baldrige, Secretary of Commerce of the United States, and Environmental Defense Fund, Inc. And Defenders of Wildlife, Inc., Intervenors-Defendants-Appellants. United States of America v. $50,178.80, the Monetary Value of 57 Tons of Tuna, and Gladiator Fishing, Inc., Claimant-Appellant
706 F.2d 937 (Ninth Circuit, 1983)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
706 F.2d 937, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/balelo-v-baldrige-ca9-1983.