John Powell v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

John Powell v. State

DecidedOctober 12, 2023

DocketA23A0895

StatusPublished

This text of John Powell v. State (John Powell v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

John Powell v. State, (Ga. Ct. App. 2023).

Pincite

Opinion

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________ October 12, 2023

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A23A0895. POWELL v. THE STATE. A23A0897. SCOTT v. THE STATE.

John Powell, the chief of police for the Glynn County Police Department, and Brian Scott, Powell’s chief of staff, were indicted on four counts of violation of oath by a public officer. On appeal, they contend the trial court erred by denying their general demurrers because OCGA § 16-10-1, the oath of office statute, is unconstitutionally vague as applied to the facts of their cases. The Supreme Court has exclusive jurisdiction in “all cases in which the constitutionality of a law . . . has been drawn into question[.]” Ga. Const of 1983 Art. VI, Sec. VI, Para. II (1). “[I]n order to invoke [the Supreme Court’s exclusive] jurisdiction, the record must show that the trial court specifically passed on the constitutional issue.” City of Decatur v. DeKalb County, 284 Ga. 434, 436 (1) (668 SE2d 247) (2008) (citation and punctuation omitted). The Appellants enumerate as error that OCGA § 16-10-1 is unconstitutionally vague and raised this constitutional challenge below in general demurrers. This issue was ruled on by the trial court, which held that the statute is not unconstitutionally vague. Since the record shows that the trial court specifically ruled on the constitutional issue, the Supreme Court’s exclusive jurisdiction has been invoked and we “have no authority to determine the constitutionality of [OCGA § 16-10-1.]” Burson v. State, 183 Ga. App. 647, 648 (1) (359 SE2d 731) (1987) (citation omitted). Accordingly, we hereby TRANSFER these cases to the Supreme Court for disposition. Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________ 10/12/2023 I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________ October 12, 2023

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A23A0895. POWELL v. THE STATE. A23A0897. SCOTT v. THE STATE.

John Powell, the chief of police for the Glynn County Police Department, and Brian Scott, Powell’s chief of staff, were indicted on four counts of violation of oath by a public officer. On appeal, they contend the trial court erred by denying their general demurrers because OCGA § 16-10-1, the oath of office statute, is unconstitutionally vague as applied to the facts of their cases. The Supreme Court has exclusive jurisdiction in “all cases in which the constitutionality of a law . . . has been drawn into question[.]” Ga. Const of 1983 Art. VI, Sec. VI, Para. II (1). “[I]n order to invoke [the Supreme Court’s exclusive] jurisdiction, the record must show that the trial court specifically passed on the constitutional issue.” City of Decatur v. DeKalb County, 284 Ga. 434, 436 (1) (668 SE2d 247) (2008) (citation and punctuation omitted). The Appellants enumerate as error that OCGA § 16-10-1 is unconstitutionally vague and raised this constitutional challenge below in general demurrers. This issue was ruled on by the trial court, which held that the statute is not unconstitutionally vague. Since the record shows that the trial court specifically ruled on the constitutional issue, the Supreme Court’s exclusive jurisdiction has been invoked and we “have no authority to determine the constitutionality of [OCGA § 16-10-1.]” Burson v. State, 183 Ga. App. 647, 648 (1) (359 SE2d 731) (1987) (citation omitted). Accordingly, we hereby TRANSFER these cases to the Supreme Court for disposition. Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________ 10/12/2023 I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

John Powell v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/john-powell-v-state-gactapp-2023.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack