John Does 11-18 v. Department of Corrections

CourtMichigan Supreme Court
DecidedJuly 25, 2017
Docket154631
StatusPublished

This text of John Does 11-18 v. Department of Corrections (John Does 11-18 v. Department of Corrections) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
John Does 11-18 v. Department of Corrections, (Mich. 2017).

Opinion

Order Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

July 25, 2017 Stephen J. Markman, Chief Justice

154631(55) Brian K. Zahra Bridget M. McCormack JOHN DOE 11, JOHN DOE 12, JOHN DOE 13, David F. Viviano Richard H. Bernstein JOHN DOE 14, JOHN DOE 15, JOHN DOE 16, Joan L. Larsen JOHN DOE 17, JOHN DOE 18, and JANE Kurtis T. Wilder, DOE 1, on behalf of themselves and a class of all Justices others similarly situated, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v SC: 154631 COA: 332260 Washtenaw CC: 13-001196-CZ DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, GOVERNOR OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, DIRECTOR OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF MDOC CORRECTIONAL FACILITIES ADMINISTRATION, FORMER DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF MDOC CORRECTIONAL FACILITIES ADMINISTRATION, CHIEF DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF MDOC CORRECTIONAL FACILITIES ADMINISTRATION, WARDEN OF CARSON CITY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, WARDEN OF CHARLES EGELER RECEPTION AND GUIDANCE CENTER, WARDEN OF EARNEST C. BROOKS CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, WARDEN OF GUS HARRISON CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, WARDEN OF RICHARD A. HANDLON CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, WARDEN OF OAKS CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, WARDEN OF THUMB CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, WARDEN OF CHIPPEWA CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, WARDEN OF MARQUETTE BRANCH PRISON, WARDEN OF BELLAMY CREEK CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, WARDEN OF KINROSS CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, WARDEN OF NEWBERRY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, WARDEN OF MICHIGAN REFORMATORY, and WARDEN OF SAGINAW CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, Defendants-Appellants. _________________________________________/ 2

On order of the Court, the motion for reconsideration of this Court’s April 4, 2017 order is considered, and it is DENIED, because it does not appear that the order was entered erroneously.

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. July 25, 2017 d0717 Clerk

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
John Does 11-18 v. Department of Corrections, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/john-does-11-18-v-department-of-corrections-mich-2017.