John Does 11-18 v. Department of Corrections

CourtMichigan Supreme Court
DecidedJanuary 7, 2020
Docket160514
StatusPublished

This text of John Does 11-18 v. Department of Corrections (John Does 11-18 v. Department of Corrections) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
John Does 11-18 v. Department of Corrections, (Mich. 2020).

Opinion

Order Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

January 7, 2020 Bridget M. McCormack, Chief Justice

David F. Viviano, Chief Justice Pro Tem 160514(26) Stephen J. Markman Brian K. Zahra JOHN DOES 11-18, JANE DOE 1, and all Richard H. Bernstein others similarly situated, Elizabeth T. Clement Plaintiffs-Appellees, Megan K. Cavanagh, Justices SC: 160514 v COA: 349073 Washtenaw CC: 13-001196-C DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, GOVERNOR, FORMER DIRECTOR DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, FORMER DEPUTY DIRECTOR DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS FACILITIES ADMINISTRATION, FORMER CHIEF DEPUTY DIRECTOR DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS FACILITIES ADMINISTRATION, FORMER WARDEN OF CHARLES EGELER RECEPTION AND GUIDANCE CENTER, FORMER WARDEN OF EARNEST C. BROOKS CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, FORMER WARDEN OF RICHARD A. HANDLON CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, FORMER WARDEN OF RICHARD A. HANDLON CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, FORMER WARDEN OF OAKS CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, FORMER WARDEN OF THUMB CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, FORMER WARDEN OF CHIPPEWA CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, WARDEN OF KINROSS CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, FORMER WARDEN OF NEWBERRY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, and FORMER WARDEN OF MICHIGAN REFORMATORY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, Defendants-Appellants. ____________________________________________/

On order of the Chief Justice, the motion of defendants-appellants to extend the time for filing their reply is GRANTED. The reply will be accepted as timely filed if submitted on or before January 24, 2020.

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. January 7, 2020

Clerk

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
John Does 11-18 v. Department of Corrections, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/john-does-11-18-v-department-of-corrections-mich-2020.