John Conner Constr., Inc. v. Grandfather Holding Co., LLC

742 S.E.2d 802, 366 N.C. 547, 2013 WL 2951952, 2013 N.C. LEXIS 492
CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina
DecidedJune 13, 2013
Docket460A12
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 742 S.E.2d 802 (John Conner Constr., Inc. v. Grandfather Holding Co., LLC) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
John Conner Constr., Inc. v. Grandfather Holding Co., LLC, 742 S.E.2d 802, 366 N.C. 547, 2013 WL 2951952, 2013 N.C. LEXIS 492 (N.C. 2013).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Justice BEASLEY took no part in the consideration or decision of this case. The remaining members of the Court are equally divided, with three members voting to affirm and three members voting to reverse the decision of the Court of Appeals. Accordingly, the decision of the Court of Appeals stands without precedential value. See, e.g., Amward Homes, Inc. v. Town of Cary, 365 N.C. 305, 716 S.E.2d 849 (2011); Goldston v. State, 364 N.C. 416, 700 S.E.2d 223 (2010). As to the issue allowed in plaintiffs’ petition for discretionary review, we hold that discretionary review was improvidently allowed.

AFFIRMED; DISCRETIONARY REVIEW IMPROVIDENTLY ALLOWED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Mole' v. City of Durham
Supreme Court of North Carolina, 2023

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
742 S.E.2d 802, 366 N.C. 547, 2013 WL 2951952, 2013 N.C. LEXIS 492, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/john-conner-constr-inc-v-grandfather-holding-co-llc-nc-2013.