John Conner Constr., Inc. v. Grandfather Holding Co., LLC

742 S.E.2d 802, 366 N.C. 547, 2013 WL 2951952, 2013 N.C. LEXIS 492
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided June 13, 2013·No. 460A12·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Justice BEASLEY took no part in the consideration or decision of this case. The remaining members of the Court are equally divided, with three members voting to affirm and three members voting to reverse the decision of the Court of Appeals. Accordingly, the decision of the Court of Appeals stands without precedential value. See, e.g., Amward Homes, Inc. v. Town of Cary, 365 N.C. 305, 716 S.E.2d 849 (2011); Goldston v. State, 364 N.C. 416, 700 S.E.2d 223 (2010). As to the issue allowed in plaintiffs’ petition for discretionary review, we hold that discretionary review was improvidently allowed.

AFFIRMED; DISCRETIONARY REVIEW IMPROVIDENTLY ALLOWED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

John Conner Constr., Inc. v. Grandfather Holding Co., LLC, 742 S.E.2d 802, 366 N.C. 547, 2013 WL 2951952, 2013 N.C. LEXIS 492 (N.C. 2013).

742 S.E.2d 802 (John Conner Constr., Inc. v. Grandfather Holding Co., LLC) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Mole' v. City of Durham
Supreme Court of North Carolina, 2023