John A. Gray v. Maurice H. Sigler, Chairman, United States Board of Parole
Opinion
We have reviewed the record and find the appeal to be without merit. The right to a federal parole revocation hearing does not accrue while the parolee is serving an intervening federal sentence and the parole violator warrant remains unexecuted. Trimmings v. Henderson, 5 Cir., 1974, 498 F.2d 86, cert. denied, 420 U.S. 931, 95 S.Ct. 1135, 43 L.Ed.2d 405; Burnett v. United States Board of Parole, 5 Cir., 1974, 491 F.2d 966; Cook v. United States Attorney General, 5 Cir., 1974, 488 F.2d 667, cert. denied, 419 U.S. 846, 95 S.Ct. 81, 42 L.Ed.2d *1009 75; Landman v. Carlson, 5 Cir., 1972, 463 F.2d 218, cert. denied, 410 U.S. 985, 93 S.Ct. 1512, 36 L.Ed.2d 182; Galloway v. Attorney General, 5 Cir., 1971, 451 F.2d 357; Cox v. Feldkamp, 5 Cir., 1971, 438 F.2d 1; Smith v. Blackwell, 5 Cir., 1966, 367 F.2d 539. Petitioner previously and unsuccessfully raised the same issue in a separate action, Gray v. Hogan, N.D.Ga., 1974, 388 F.Supp. 476, from which no appeal was taken.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
532 F.2d 1008 (John A. Gray v. Maurice H. Sigler, Chairman, United States Board of Parole) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.