John A. Cross v. S. S. Kaimana, Her Engines, Etc., John A. Cross v. S. S. Lanakila, Her Engines, Etc., John A. Cross v. S. S. Alaska Bear, Her Engines, Etc., John A. Cross v. S. S. Pacific Bear, Her Engines, Etc., John A. Cross v. S. S. Coast Progress, Her Engines, Etc.

401 F.2d 182
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedFebruary 24, 1969
Docket21719
StatusPublished
Cited by7 cases

This text of 401 F.2d 182 (John A. Cross v. S. S. Kaimana, Her Engines, Etc., John A. Cross v. S. S. Lanakila, Her Engines, Etc., John A. Cross v. S. S. Alaska Bear, Her Engines, Etc., John A. Cross v. S. S. Pacific Bear, Her Engines, Etc., John A. Cross v. S. S. Coast Progress, Her Engines, Etc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
John A. Cross v. S. S. Kaimana, Her Engines, Etc., John A. Cross v. S. S. Lanakila, Her Engines, Etc., John A. Cross v. S. S. Alaska Bear, Her Engines, Etc., John A. Cross v. S. S. Pacific Bear, Her Engines, Etc., John A. Cross v. S. S. Coast Progress, Her Engines, Etc., 401 F.2d 182 (9th Cir. 1969).

Opinion

401 F.2d 182

John A. CROSS et al., Appellants,
v.
S. S. KAIMANA, her engines, etc., et al., Appellees.
John A. CROSS et al., Appellants,
v.
S. S. LANAKILA, her engines, etc., et al., Appellees.
John A. CROSS et al., Appellants,
v.
S. S. ALASKA BEAR, her engines, etc., et al., Appellees.
John A. CROSS et al., Appellants,
v.
S. S. PACIFIC BEAR, her engines, etc., et al., Appellees.
John A. CROSS et al., Appellants,
v.
S. S. COAST PROGRESS, her engines, etc., et al., Appellees.

Nos. 21719, 21719-A to 21719-D.

United States Court of Appeals Ninth Circuit.

Oct. 16, 1968, Certiorari Denied Feb. 24, 1969, See 89 S.Ct. 879.

Richard Ernst (argued), John Paul Jennings (argued), San Francisco, Cal., Richard G. Larson Oakland, Cal., Marvin C. Taylor, Edgartown, Mass., for appellants.

John Hays (argued), of Dorr, Cooper & Hays, Severson, Zang, Werson, Berke & Larson, John F. Meadows, Chief, Adm. & Shipping Sec., McCutchen, Doyle, Brown & Enersen, San Francisco, Cal., for appellees.

Before POPE, HAMLEY and MERRILL, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

The judgments in the above-entitled causes, consolidated for trial and appeal, are affirmed for the reasons stated in the opinion of the district court reported sub nom. Long Island Tankers Corporation et al. v. S. S. Kaimana et al., 265 F.Supp. 723.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
401 F.2d 182, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/john-a-cross-v-s-s-kaimana-her-engines-etc-john-a-cross-v-s-s-ca9-1969.