Bailey's Bakery, Ltd. v. Continental Baking Company and Love's Biscuit and Bread Co., Inc.
This text of 401 F.2d 182 (Bailey's Bakery, Ltd. v. Continental Baking Company and Love's Biscuit and Bread Co., Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This is a private action for treble damages under the Clayton Act and the Sherman Act. The case was tried before a jury, which returned verdicts in favor of appellees.
Appellant urges numerous assignments of error, some 135 in all, a small number of which were actively pursued. We have examined the record and the briefs of the parties. Considering the record as a *183 whole, we conclude that there was insufficient evidence that any loss which appellant sustained proximately resulted from illegal activity on the part of the appellees to justify submission of this issue to the jury.
The judgment is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
401 F.2d 182, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/baileys-bakery-ltd-v-continental-baking-company-and-loves-biscuit-and-ca9-1969.