Bailey's Bakery, Ltd. v. Continental Baking Company and Love's Biscuit and Bread Co., Inc.

Ninth Circuit

Bailey's Bakery, Ltd. v. Continental Baking Company and Love's Biscuit and Bread Co., Inc.

401 F.2d 182

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided February 24, 1969·No. 21163_1·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

This is a private action for treble damages under the Clayton Act and the Sherman Act. The case was tried before a jury, which returned verdicts in favor of appellees.

Appellant urges numerous assignments of error, some 135 in all, a small number of which were actively pursued. We have examined the record and the briefs of the parties. Considering the record as a *183 whole, we conclude that there was insufficient evidence that any loss which appellant sustained proximately resulted from illegal activity on the part of the appellees to justify submission of this issue to the jury.

The judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

This is a private action for treble damages under the Clayton Act and the Sherman Act. The case was tried before a jury, which returned verdicts in favor of appellees.

Appellant urges numerous assignments of error, some 135 in all, a small number of which were actively pursued. We have examined the record and the briefs of the parties. Considering the record as a *183 whole, we conclude that there was insufficient evidence that any loss which appellant sustained proximately resulted from illegal activity on the part of the appellees to justify submission of this issue to the jury.

The judgment is affirmed.

Bailey's Bakery, Ltd. v. Continental Baking Company and Love's Biscuit and Bread Co., Inc., 401 F.2d 182 (9th Cir. 1969).

Pincite

401 F.2d 182 (Bailey's Bakery, Ltd. v. Continental Baking Company and Love's Biscuit and Bread Co., Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related