Joevel Williams v. State of Florida

178 So. 3d 531, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 16569, 2015 WL 6738720
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided November 4, 2015·No. 4D14-2553·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

DAMOORGIAN, J.

Appellant appeals the judgment and sentence entered after his no contest plea to one count of unlawfully carrying a concealed firearm. Appellant argues that the court erred because although it granted his motion for a competency hearing under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.210(b), the court accepted his plea and sentenced him without conducting the hearing. In order to raise this issue on appeal, Appellant was required to file a motion to withdraw plea. Burns v. State, 884 So.2d 1010, 1012 (Fla. 4th DCA 2004). See also Bailey v. State, 21 So.3d 147, 150 (Fla. 5th DCA 2009). Because Appellant failed to do so, we can only review for fundamental error. Burns, 884 So.2d at 1012. As this Court established in Bums, a court’s failure to hold a Rule 3.210(b) competency hearing does not rise to the level of fundamental error. Id. at 1014.

Accordingly, we affirm the judgment and sentence without prejudice to Appellant’s right to seek appropriate post-conviction relief in the trial court.

Affirmed.

STEVENSON and CONNER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Joevel Williams v. State of Florida, 178 So. 3d 531, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 16569, 2015 WL 6738720 (Fla. Ct. App. 2015).

178 So. 3d 531 (Joevel Williams v. State of Florida) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Dortch v. State
242 So. 3d 431 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2018)
VERNSON EDWARD DORTCH v. STATE OF FLORIDA
District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2018