Burns v. State

881 So. 2d 697, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 12871, 2004 WL 1932725
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedSeptember 1, 2004
DocketNo. 1D03-4332
StatusPublished

This text of 881 So. 2d 697 (Burns v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Burns v. State, 881 So. 2d 697, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 12871, 2004 WL 1932725 (Fla. Ct. App. 2004).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the trial court’s denial of the appellant’s motion to correct illegal sentence. See Pitts v. State, 855 So.2d 681 (Fla. 1st DCA 2003); State v. Franklin, 836 So.2d 1112 (Fla. 3d DCA 2003), review granted, 854 So.2d 659 (Fla.2003). We certify conflict with Taylor v. State, 818 So.2d 544 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002), review dismissed, 821 So.2d 302 (Fla.2002).

AFFIRMED

ERVIN, ALLEN and HAWKES, JJ., CONCUR.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Taylor v. State
818 So. 2d 544 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2002)
State v. Franklin
836 So. 2d 1112 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2003)
Pitts v. State
855 So. 2d 681 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2003)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
881 So. 2d 697, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 12871, 2004 WL 1932725, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/burns-v-state-fladistctapp-2004.