Joe Alfred Izen Junior v. Brian Laine and Kimberly Laine
This text of Joe Alfred Izen Junior v. Brian Laine and Kimberly Laine (Joe Alfred Izen Junior v. Brian Laine and Kimberly Laine) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order filed January 29, 2019
In The
Fourteenth Court of Appeals ____________
NO. 14-18-00216-CV ____________
JOE ALFRED IZEN JUNIOR, Appellant
V.
BRIAN LAINE AND KIMBERLY LAINE, Appellee
On Appeal from the 55th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2013-28211
ORDER
The reporter’s record in this case was filed December 10, 2018. On January 4, 2019, appellant filed a motion to supplement the reporter’s record. Appellant indicates he requested the following transcripts which have not been filed with the court:
• November 16, 2015 motion to compel production hearing; • September 26, 2015 motion to quash hearing; • May 13, 2017 motion for attorney’s fees hearing; • March 13, 2017 hearing on entry of judgment; • June 12, 2017 motion for new trial hearing; • June 26, 2017 motion for sanctions hearing; and • February 26, 2018 motion for new trial hearing.
Gina Jackson, the official court reporter for the 55th District Court of Harris County, is directed to file a supplemental reporter’s record containing all requested transcripts on or before February 19, 2019.
If any of the requested transcripts were not recorded, Gina Jackson is directed to file a certified statement detailing which requested transcripts are not part of the record on or before February 19, 2019.
If appellant has not made arrangements to pay for the reporter’s record or is declared indigent, Gina Jackson is directed to file a certified statement detailing which requested transcripts have not been paid for on or before February 19, 2019. See Tex. R. App. P. 35.3(b)(3); Tex. R. Civ. P. 145.
Appellant’s brief is due 20 days after the complete reporter’s record has been filed or a certified statement filed that the requested transcripts are not part of the record.
PER CURIAM
Panel consists of Justices Wise, Zimmerer, and Spain.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Joe Alfred Izen Junior v. Brian Laine and Kimberly Laine, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/joe-alfred-izen-junior-v-brian-laine-and-kimberly-laine-texapp-2019.