Joe Alfred Izen Junior v. Brian Laine and Kimberly Laine

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedJanuary 29, 2019
Docket14-18-00216-CV
StatusPublished

This text of Joe Alfred Izen Junior v. Brian Laine and Kimberly Laine (Joe Alfred Izen Junior v. Brian Laine and Kimberly Laine) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Joe Alfred Izen Junior v. Brian Laine and Kimberly Laine, (Tex. Ct. App. 2019).

Opinion

Order filed January 29, 2019

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals ____________

NO. 14-18-00216-CV ____________

JOE ALFRED IZEN JUNIOR, Appellant

V.

BRIAN LAINE AND KIMBERLY LAINE, Appellee

On Appeal from the 55th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2013-28211

ORDER

The reporter’s record in this case was filed December 10, 2018. On January 4, 2019, appellant filed a motion to supplement the reporter’s record. Appellant indicates he requested the following transcripts which have not been filed with the court:

• November 16, 2015 motion to compel production hearing; • September 26, 2015 motion to quash hearing; • May 13, 2017 motion for attorney’s fees hearing; • March 13, 2017 hearing on entry of judgment; • June 12, 2017 motion for new trial hearing; • June 26, 2017 motion for sanctions hearing; and • February 26, 2018 motion for new trial hearing.

Gina Jackson, the official court reporter for the 55th District Court of Harris County, is directed to file a supplemental reporter’s record containing all requested transcripts on or before February 19, 2019.

If any of the requested transcripts were not recorded, Gina Jackson is directed to file a certified statement detailing which requested transcripts are not part of the record on or before February 19, 2019.

If appellant has not made arrangements to pay for the reporter’s record or is declared indigent, Gina Jackson is directed to file a certified statement detailing which requested transcripts have not been paid for on or before February 19, 2019. See Tex. R. App. P. 35.3(b)(3); Tex. R. Civ. P. 145.

Appellant’s brief is due 20 days after the complete reporter’s record has been filed or a certified statement filed that the requested transcripts are not part of the record.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Wise, Zimmerer, and Spain.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Joe Alfred Izen Junior v. Brian Laine and Kimberly Laine, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/joe-alfred-izen-junior-v-brian-laine-and-kimberly-laine-texapp-2019.