Joe Alfred Izen Junior v. Brian Laine and Kimberly Laine
This text of Joe Alfred Izen Junior v. Brian Laine and Kimberly Laine (Joe Alfred Izen Junior v. Brian Laine and Kimberly Laine) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Motion Granted in Part and Denied in Part and Order filed July 19, 2018.
In The
Fourteenth Court of Appeals ____________
NO. 14-18-00216-CV ____________
JOE ALFRED IZEN JR., Appellant
V.
BRIAN LAINE AND KIMBERLY LAINE, Appellees
On Appeal from the 55th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2013-28211
CONTINUING ABATEMENT ORDER The court abated this appeal on May 3, 2018 to allow the parties to mediate this case. On July 3, 2018, appellant filed motion to extend the abatement period. The motion is granted in part and denied in part and we issue the following order.
We deny appellant’s motion to the extent it requests appointment of a mediator. The parties may select a mediator by agreement.
The appeal is abated, treated as a closed case, and removed from this court’s active docket until September 4, 2018. The appeal will be reinstated on this court’s active docket at that time, or when the parties file a motion to dismiss the appeal or other dispositive motion. The court will also consider an appropriate motion to reinstate the appeal filed by either party, or the court may reinstate the appeal on its own motion.
PER CURIAM
Panel consists of Justices Jamison, Wise, and Jewell.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Joe Alfred Izen Junior v. Brian Laine and Kimberly Laine, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/joe-alfred-izen-junior-v-brian-laine-and-kimberly-laine-texapp-2018.