Jobert-Kendall, Inc. v. Kendall Commercial Associates

491 So. 2d 1301, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 1692, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 9217
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided August 5, 1986·No. Nos. 86-983, 85-2273·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We reverse the awards of attorney s fees, costs, and interest to the appellee-mortgagee on the holdings that (a) the well-supported determination below “that some conduct of the [mortgagee] in a measure contributed to the defendants’ failure to pay within the grace period,” which the trial court properly found precluded acceleration and foreclosure, likewise barred the recovery of attorney’s fees and costs, Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corp. v. Taylor, 318 So.2d 203 (Fla. 1st DCA 1975); cf. Rice v. Campisi, 446 So.2d 1120 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984), pet. for review denied, 456 So.2d 1182 (Fla.1984) (mortgagee who did not contribute to default properly awarded fees and costs even though foreclosure was denied because late payment was caused by post office), and (b) the appellants-mortgagors’ appropriate, but rejected, tenders of the amounts due relieved them of any obligation to pay interest. Dade County v. American Re-Insurance Co., 467 So.2d 414 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985); Morton v. Ansin, 129 So.2d 177 (Fla. 3d DCA 1961).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Jobert-Kendall, Inc. v. Kendall Commercial Associates, 491 So. 2d 1301, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 1692, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 9217 (Fla. Ct. App. 1986).

491 So. 2d 1301 (Jobert-Kendall, Inc. v. Kendall Commercial Associates) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

RJ & RK, Inc. v. Spence
855 So. 2d 642 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2003)
Konigsburg v. Grand
529 So. 2d 1180 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1988)