Joan Wilkerson, Next of Kin and of the Estate of Harrell Wilkerson Jr. v. Augusta Hospital D/B/A as Trinity Hospital

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Joan Wilkerson, Next of Kin and of the Estate of Harrell Wilkerson Jr. v. Augusta Hospital D/B/A as Trinity Hospital

DecidedOctober 6, 2015

DocketA16I0030

StatusPublished

This text of Joan Wilkerson, Next of Kin and of the Estate of Harrell Wilkerson Jr. v. Augusta Hospital D/B/A as Trinity Hospital (Joan Wilkerson, Next of Kin and of the Estate of Harrell Wilkerson Jr. v. Augusta Hospital D/B/A as Trinity Hospital) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Joan Wilkerson, Next of Kin and of the Estate of Harrell Wilkerson Jr. v. Augusta Hospital D/B/A as Trinity Hospital, (Ga. Ct. App. 2015).

Pincite

Opinion

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________ October 05, 2015

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A16I0030. JOAN WILKERSON v. AUGUSTA HOSPITAL, LLC.

Joan Wilkerson, as Next of Kin and Executrix of the estate of Harrell Wilkerson, Jr., seeks interlocutory review of an August 19, 2015 order dismissing defendant Augusta Hospital, LLC d/b/a Trinity Hospital of Augusta. The certificate of immediate review, however, was not entered until 23 days later, on September 11, 2015. Under OCGA § 5-6-34 (b), a party may request interlocutory review only if the trial court certifies within ten days of entry of the order at issue that immediate review should be had. If the certificate of immediate review is not entered within that ten- day period, it is untimely, and the party seeking review must wait until the final judgment to appeal. See OCGA § 5-6-34 (b); Turner v. Harper, 231 Ga. 175, 176 (200 SE2d 748) (1973). Here, although the trial court signed the certificate of immediate review nunc pro tunc to August 19, 2015, the relevant date for determining the timeliness of the certificate is the date it was entered. See Van Schallern v. Stanco, 130 Ga. App. 687 (204 SE2d 317) (1974) (“[A] certificate for the immediate review of a nonfinal or interlocutory judgment is ineffective unless entered, i.e., filed with the clerk, within ten days after entry of the judgment appealed from.”); Whitlock v. State, 124 Ga. App. 599, 601 (1) (185 SE2d 90) (1971) (“A nunc pro tunc entry of a certificate for immediate review cannot revive a right of appeal which has expired.”). Because the trial court did not enter the certificate of immediate review within ten days of entry of the order at issue, we lack jurisdiction to consider this application, which is hereby DISMISSED.

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia 10/05/2015 Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________ I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________ October 05, 2015

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A16I0030. JOAN WILKERSON v. AUGUSTA HOSPITAL, LLC.

Joan Wilkerson, as Next of Kin and Executrix of the estate of Harrell Wilkerson, Jr., seeks interlocutory review of an August 19, 2015 order dismissing defendant Augusta Hospital, LLC d/b/a Trinity Hospital of Augusta. The certificate of immediate review, however, was not entered until 23 days later, on September 11, 2015. Under OCGA § 5-6-34 (b), a party may request interlocutory review only if the trial court certifies within ten days of entry of the order at issue that immediate review should be had. If the certificate of immediate review is not entered within that ten- day period, it is untimely, and the party seeking review must wait until the final judgment to appeal. See OCGA § 5-6-34 (b); Turner v. Harper, 231 Ga. 175, 176 (200 SE2d 748) (1973). Here, although the trial court signed the certificate of immediate review nunc pro tunc to August 19, 2015, the relevant date for determining the timeliness of the certificate is the date it was entered. See Van Schallern v. Stanco, 130 Ga. App. 687 (204 SE2d 317) (1974) (“[A] certificate for the immediate review of a nonfinal or interlocutory judgment is ineffective unless entered, i.e., filed with the clerk, within ten days after entry of the judgment appealed from.”); Whitlock v. State, 124 Ga. App. 599, 601 (1) (185 SE2d 90) (1971) (“A nunc pro tunc entry of a certificate for immediate review cannot revive a right of appeal which has expired.”). Because the trial court did not enter the certificate of immediate review within ten days of entry of the order at issue, we lack jurisdiction to consider this application, which is hereby DISMISSED.

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia 10/05/2015 Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________ I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Joan Wilkerson, Next of Kin and of the Estate of Harrell Wilkerson Jr. v. Augusta Hospital D/B/A as Trinity Hospital, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/joan-wilkerson-next-of-kin-and-of-the-estate-of-ha-gactapp-2015.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack