Joachin v. Care Stat Staffing
Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK NADINE JOACHIN, Plaintiff, -against- 23cv10803 (LTS) CARE STAT STAFFING; ROCK CIVIL JUDGMENT REHABILITATION NURSING HOME; DAVID AMAR; CARMENT; ERICA, Defendants. For the reasons stated in the October 18, 2024, order, this action is dismissed. By order dated June 10, 2024, the Court directed Plaintiff to file an amended complaint within sixty days. That order specified that failure to comply would result in dismissal of the complaint for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. Plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint. Accordingly, the complaint, filed in forma pauperis (IFP) under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(1), is dismissed under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii). The Court certifies under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from the order would not be taken in good faith, and therefore IFP status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. Cf. Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962) (holding that an appellant demonstrates good faith when he seeks review of a nonfrivolous issue) SO ORDERED.
Dated: October 25, 2024 New York, New York
/s/ Laura Taylor Swain LAURA TAYLOR SWAIN Chief United States District Judge
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Joachin v. Care Stat Staffing (Joachin v. Care Stat Staffing) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.