Joachim Osayande Osojie v. Vivian Osojie

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided August 27, 2009·No. 03-08-00688-CV·Published

Opinion

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-09-00388-CV

In re Mario Lavon Gamble

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING FROM BELL COUNTY

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Relator Mario Lavon Gamble filed a petition for writ of mandamus, complaining that

the trial court had not set his motion for DNA testing for a hearing. See Tex. R. App. P. 52.8. Since

his filing, the trial court has provided this Court with an order showing that Gamble’s motion was

heard and denied. Gamble has received the relief he sought through his original proceeding, and any

appeal of the denial of his motion for DNA testing must be conducted through a direct appeal. See

Tex. Code Crim. P. 64.05 (West 2006). We deny the petition for writ of mandamus.

__________________________________________

David Puryear, Justice

Before Justices Puryear, Pemberton and Waldrop

Filed: August 27, 2009

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Joachim Osayande Osojie v. Vivian Osojie, (Tex. Ct. App. 2009).

Joachim Osayande Osojie v. Vivian Osojie (Joachim Osayande Osojie v. Vivian Osojie) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.