Joachim Osayande Osojie v. Vivian Osojie
This text of Joachim Osayande Osojie v. Vivian Osojie (Joachim Osayande Osojie v. Vivian Osojie) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
NO. 03-09-00388-CV
In re Mario Lavon Gamble
ORIGINAL PROCEEDING FROM BELL COUNTY
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Relator Mario Lavon Gamble filed a petition for writ of mandamus, complaining that
the trial court had not set his motion for DNA testing for a hearing. See Tex. R. App. P. 52.8. Since
his filing, the trial court has provided this Court with an order showing that Gamble’s motion was
heard and denied. Gamble has received the relief he sought through his original proceeding, and any
appeal of the denial of his motion for DNA testing must be conducted through a direct appeal. See
Tex. Code Crim. P. 64.05 (West 2006). We deny the petition for writ of mandamus.
__________________________________________
David Puryear, Justice
Before Justices Puryear, Pemberton and Waldrop
Filed: August 27, 2009
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Joachim Osayande Osojie v. Vivian Osojie, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/joachim-osayande-osojie-v-vivian-osojie-texapp-2009.