J.M. v. State
802 So. 2d 413, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 17075, 2001 WL 1538881
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in J.M. v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 5967 →
Opinion
Affirmed. See Miller v. State, 636 So.2d 144, 150 (Fla. 1st DCA 1994)(“[T]he question as to whether appellant had a specific intent to batter [the police officer] was a matter for the jury’s determination.”); Johnson v. State, 634 So.2d 1144 (Fla. 4th DCA 1994)(circumstantial evidence is admissible to prove states of mind such as intent).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
J.M. v. State, 802 So. 2d 413, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 17075, 2001 WL 1538881 (Fla. Ct. App. 2001).
802 So. 2d 413 (J.M. v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Miller v. State
636 So. 2d 144 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1994)
Johnson v. State
634 So. 2d 1144 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1994)