J.M. v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

J.M. v. State

779 So. 2d 606, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 2083, 2001 WL 194034

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedFebruary 28, 2001

DocketNo. 2D99-4272

StatusPublished

This text of 779 So. 2d 606 (J.M. v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

J.M. v. State, 779 So. 2d 606, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 2083, 2001 WL 194034 (Fla. Ct. App. 2001).

Pincite

Opinion

WHATLEY, Judge.

We find no merit in J.M.’s appeal of his adjudication of delinquency for the charge of possession of cocaine, and we affirm that adjudication.

We remand with directions that the trial court strike the obstructing charge from the disposition order in accordance with its granting of J.M.’s motion for judgment of acquittal of that charge at the close of the State’s case.

Affirmed but remanded with directions.

FULMER, A.C.J., and DAVIS, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

WHATLEY, Judge.

We find no merit in J.M.’s appeal of his adjudication of delinquency for the charge of possession of cocaine, and we affirm that adjudication.

We remand with directions that the trial court strike the obstructing charge from the disposition order in accordance with its granting of J.M.’s motion for judgment of acquittal of that charge at the close of the State’s case.

Affirmed but remanded with directions.

FULMER, A.C.J., and DAVIS, J., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

779 So. 2d 606, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 2083, 2001 WL 194034, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jm-v-state-fladistctapp-2001.